Sounds reasonable to me, Chris
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:36:56 -0700 Josh Holtzman <[email protected]> wrote: > The more barriers we create to using msub, the more institutions will > simply host their own vendor branches, so the *trends* in what > institutions need to customize remain hidden from the community. > That's why I believe we should encourage use of ECL2, but mandate > only the limitations placed upon us by our svn host (open source with > an OSI approved license). > > Josh > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Christopher Brooks > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > b) contain code that is distributed under an OSI approved license > > > [6], prefereably ECL 2.0. > > > > If we are going to require a license I prefer it to be required > > that we use ECL 2.0. So there are no questions in the future or > > muddy wading through svn logs. And I prefer that everyone with > > access have a CLA assigned. Does this seem unreasonable? > > > > Chris > > -- > > Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc > > ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan > > > > Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 > > Phone: 1.306.966.1442 > > Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems > > Laboratory Department of Computer Science > > University of Saskatchewan > > 176 Thorvaldson Building > > 110 Science Place > > Saskatoon, SK > > S7N 5C9 > > -- Christopher Brooks, BSc, MSc ARIES Laboratory, University of Saskatchewan Web: http://www.cs.usask.ca/~cab938 Phone: 1.306.966.1442 Mail: Advanced Research in Intelligent Educational Systems Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Saskatchewan 176 Thorvaldson Building 110 Science Place Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C9 _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
