I would love to have access to an adopters meeting. We are just now working on implementation. Brought the two computer systems in this morning and will be installing software and placing in largest rooms hopefully today.
Chandra Dunbar Pharmacy Educational Technology Specialist Raabe College Of Pharmacy [email protected] On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:44 AM, < [email protected]> wrote: > Send Matterhorn-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Matterhorn-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F Weekly Video > Conference Meetings #proposal #important (Adam Hochman) > 2. Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F Weekly Video > Conference Meetings #proposal #important (Walter Schwarz) > 3. Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F Weekly Video > Conference Meetings #proposal #important (Ruediger Rolf) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:22:53 -0700 > From: Adam Hochman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], Matterhorn Users > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F > Weekly Video Conference Meetings #proposal #important > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly > adoption meeting would be useful? > > On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rub?n P?rez wrote: > > Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise. > > > > El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rub?n P?rez <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> escribi?: > > > > +1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only, > > because: > > > > a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters > > (meaning: "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will > > get bored and probably never come back > > b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the > > discussion goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we will > > have less time/be more tired for focusing on development > > discussion afterwards > > > > In short, developers and adopters main interests may match > > sometimes, but most of the time are completely different. > > > > This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority > > decides. > > > > Regards, > > Rub?n > > > > > > 2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > +1 from me as well. > > > > On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and > > Thursdays any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate our > > weekly meetings by limiting them to Tuesdays. I think the > > lack of attendance has been partially due to everyone's summer > > schedules, but we need to get back on track. There are a lot > > of plans for Matterhorn in the upcoming year and its critical > > that we build in some F2F time. I would also like to suggest > > we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am to 8:00 am PST. > > > > > > I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as > > well. We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter > > Q&A for anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at > > large. I would be happy to call out for agenda items on a > > weekly basis. > > > > > > As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period. If > > no one disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via > > lazy consensus. > > > > > > Best, > > > Adam > > > > > > Matterhorn Community Liaison > > > UC Berkeley > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Matterhorn mailing list > > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.opencastproject.org/pipermail/matterhorn-users/attachments/20110808/251fb1d1/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:10:25 -0500 > From: Walter Schwarz <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], Matterhorn Users > <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], > [email protected], Matterhorn Users > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F > Weekly Video Conference Meetings #proposal #important > Message-ID: > <ofdb88bb5a.9f71cf7e-on862578e6.00799b8e-862578e6.0079c...@unl.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I believe there is great value in a monthly meeting with participation > from adopters encouraged. > > [email protected] wrote on 08/08/2011 04:22:53 > PM: > > > > Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly > > adoption meeting would be useful? > > > > On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rub?n P?rez wrote: > > Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise. > > > El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rub?n P?rez <[email protected]> > escribi?: > > +1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only, > because: > > > > a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters (meaning: > > "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will get bored > > and probably never come back > > b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the discussion > > goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we will have less > > time/be more tired for focusing on development discussion afterwards > > > > In short, developers and adopters main interests may match > > sometimes, but most of the time are completely different. > > > > This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority > decides. > > > > Regards, > > Rub?n > > > > > 2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected]> > > +1 from me as well. > > > > On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and Thursdays > > any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate our weekly meetings > > by limiting them to Tuesdays. I think the lack of attendance has > > been partially due to everyone's summer schedules, but we need to > > get back on track. There are a lot of plans for Matterhorn in the > > upcoming year and its critical that we build in some F2F time. I > > would also like to suggest we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am > > to 8:00 am PST. > > > > > > I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as well. > > We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter Q&A for > > anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at large. I would be > > happy to call out for agenda items on a weekly basis. > > > > > > As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period. If no one > > disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via lazy consensus. > > > > > > Best, > > > Adam > > > > > > Matterhorn Community Liaison > > > UC Berkeley > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Matterhorn mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > > [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.opencastproject.org/pipermail/matterhorn-users/attachments/20110808/f5de2d82/attachment-0001.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:43:55 +0200 > From: Ruediger Rolf <[email protected]> > To: Opencast Matterhorn <[email protected]> > Cc: Matterhorn Users <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Matterhorn-users] [Opencast Matterhorn] Changes to F2F > Weekly Video Conference Meetings #proposal #important > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > +1 for the meeting once a week. > > +1 for allowing adopters in this meeting. I guess it would be good for > the developers to get some frequent feedback from the users. > > R?diger > > Am 08.08.2011 23:22, schrieb Adam Hochman: > > Does anyone from the matterhorn-users list think a separate, monthly > > adoption meeting would be useful? > > > > On 8/8/11 2:03 PM, Rub?n P?rez wrote: > >> Resending this to the matterhorn mail list as well. Sorry for the noise. > >> > >> El 8 de agosto de 2011 23:00, Rub?n P?rez <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> escribi?: > >> > >> +1 , and +1 to Chris opinion of leaving them for developers only, > >> because: > >> > >> a) If a lot of dev. related topics are discussed, adopters > >> (meaning: "adopters not interesting in development aspects") will > >> get bored and probably never come back > >> b) If we focus on adopters first, and it happens that the > >> discussion goes on for a considerable amount of time, then we > >> will have less time/be more tired for focusing on development > >> discussion afterwards > >> > >> In short, developers and adopters main interests may match > >> sometimes, but most of the time are completely different. > >> > >> This is just an opinion, though. I'll stick to what the majority > >> decides. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rub?n > >> > >> > >> 2011/8/8 Tobias Wunden <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >> > >> +1 from me as well. > >> > >> On 08.08.2011, at 21:47, Adam Hochman wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > It's apparent that we don't need to meet Tuesdays and > >> Thursdays any more, nevertheless, I'd like to reinvigorate > >> our weekly meetings by limiting them to Tuesdays. I think > >> the lack of attendance has been partially due to everyone's > >> summer schedules, but we need to get back on track. There > >> are a lot of plans for Matterhorn in the upcoming year and > >> its critical that we build in some F2F time. I would also > >> like to suggest we move the Tuesday meeting from 7:30 am to > >> 8:00 am PST. > >> > > >> > I also suggest that we open the meetings up to adopters as > >> well. We can dedicate a small portion of our time to Adopter > >> Q&A for anyone from matterhorn-users or the community at > >> large. I would be happy to call out for agenda items on a > >> weekly basis. > >> > > >> > As always, proposals have a 72 hour incubation period. If > >> no one disagrees, this proposal will be put into practice via > >> lazy consensus. > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > Adam > >> > > >> > Matterhorn Community Liaison > >> > UC Berkeley > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Matterhorn mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > >> > > >> > > >> > To unsubscribe please email > >> > [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Matterhorn-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > >> > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Matterhorn mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > >> > >> > >> To unsubscribe please email > >> [email protected] > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Matterhorn mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > > -- > > ________________________________________________ > R?diger Rolf, M.A. > Universit?t Osnabr?ck - Zentrum virtUOS > Heger-Tor-Wall 12, 49069 Osnabr?ck > Telefon: (0541) 969-6511 - Fax: (0541) 969-16511 > E-Mail: [email protected] > Internet: www.virtuos.uni-osnabrueck.de > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.opencastproject.org/pipermail/matterhorn-users/attachments/20110809/8b1b32aa/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users > > > End of Matterhorn-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 5 > *********************************************** > --
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
