I don't mind freezing API. But it receantly changed. If it will survive three 
consecutive releases (1.3, 1.4, 1.5) - we can talk about freezing it. Right now 
it is too early. We will just spend time chatting about it.

I think a detailed spec for the API would solve the problem. I think this would 
increase the value and quality of the server itself. However, there are 
following questions:
 - who is the person that can approve this idea / other idea?
 - who is the person that can approve the spec ?
 - who will develop a spec (a list of people)?
 - when the first revision of spec will be finished (like this week / next week 
) to be aproved by appropriate person?

Maybe there are other questions like:
 - is the API needed at all ?
 - do we want third party Capture Agents/Schedulers/Content Servers to 
integrate with Matterhorn? 

There are hundrets of questions I want to ask about the API, but this thread is 
not a right place.  I would love to post them later to people that will be 
approving/documenting API (I think I can help documenting the API) but right 
now - Important question (for this thread / and or Matterhorn) is how to solve 
(Hank's, mine, Matterhorn's)  problem with API that I think is not documented 
and instantly changing. Previous post contained some examples. 

It is really my business here to agree/understand the API / integrate with 
Matterhorn. 
Can we agree on how to solve this problem (what to do) in two days ? I guess 
since we are from all over the world then lets say in 48 hours. :-) And then 
solve it in a week ?

BTW: We need a person or some kind of Matterhorns Board to approve the 
solution, right? If there are no people that manage the project we need to 
start a revolution, step up and set a direction and destination. :-) 

-Pawel

Well, I would say "how can the API *not* be frozen at this stage of 
development?". I mean, Matterhorn is not in a beta version. It's 1.2. One would 
expect some well-developed APIs at this stage, it's not like we have not tested 
the system and we don't know what we want it to do and how.
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

Reply via email to