Hi Jonathan, matterhorn does not maky heavy (read: no) use of specific database features, so feel free to choose whatever you are best familiar with. Note that the database scripts in 1.3 still need some tweaking, but both MySQL and PostgreSQL should be good to use.
Tobias On 14.10.2011, at 18:46, Jonathan Felder wrote: > I am looking at using either mysql or postgresql as the database back end for > Matterhorn. Are there any Matterhorn specific reasons to choose one over the > other? > > I am leaning toward postgresql for a few reasons, none of which are directly > related to Matterhorn. Things such as ACID compliance, better support for > triggers, and licensing concerns (Oracle is already starting to add for pay > only features). > > -- > Jon > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
