On 11-11-24 04:23 AM, Steven Jack wrote: > I note that the install notes refer to Ubuntu 10.10 or server team point out > that this version is only patched until 1st quarter 2012 and hence don't see > this as a sensible move. They point out that 10.04 is the long term support > release (patched until 2015) > > Does anyone know of any reason not to go with 10.04 or why 10.10 is > recommended?
10.04 is the only LTS version currently available, but it is/was affected by a critical bug which crippled h264 encoding on the CA (the core can still be run on 10.04). If you don't need h264 capture then 10.04 will work fine for both the core and the CA. Newer versions of Ubuntu may or may not work, but we unfortunately do not have the resources to test extensively. 11.10 is known to *not* work easily for the CA. Hope that helps! G > Thanks > Steven > > > **************************************** > Steven Jack > University of Glasgow > IT Services > James Watt North Building > Glasgow G12 8QQ > > [email protected] 00441413303828 > > The University of Glasgow is a charitable body, > registered in Scotland, with registration number SC004401. > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
