I believe Android 3.0+ supports HLS as well.  I've streamed to my android
phone using html5 and HLS from Wowza. At this point if I had to choose one
of the adaptive bitrate http streaming technologies it would be HLS, but
hopefully the recent push behind DASH will get us somewhere.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Ruediger Rolf <[email protected]>wrote:

> After one week I have to add 2 more findings to my H.264 experiments:
> - When rescaling you should be aware that the dimensions of your video
> must stay even numbers. If you use the ffmpeg option "-vf scale=200:-1" you
> might be unlucky that your hight can get an odd number.
> - streaming of h.264 files to mobile devices will require multiple
> streaming techniques [4].
>
> And now for me the interesting question would be, who has more experience
> with these different streaming techniques:
> - RTMP worked very reliable for us for several years now with FLV videos.
> Additional to any desktop PC that has Flash installed it works in our
> Android and iOS app [5]. Unfortunately it does not work with H.264 on iOS
> (but on Android).
> - HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS) is Adobes approach to http-streaming. I
> never used it yet, and again it does not work on iOS. I have not tried it
> on other plattforms yet.
> - HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) is Apples approach on http-streaming. This now
> works for iOS only and the latest Mac OS version. You cannot use it on
> Windows, Linux, Android, Mac OS 10.6 (try it yourself [6]). So I'm
> wondering why such a bad supported format is currently so highly requested.
> Does anyone here have experience with HLS yet?
>
> I'm currently considering to switch back to FLV as everything seemed much
> easier with this format.
>
> Regards
> Rüdiger
>
> [4] 
> http://forums.adobe.com/**message/4100805<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4100805>
> [5] 
> http://vm193.rz.uni-**osnabrueck.de/matterhorn2go/**index_en.html<http://vm193.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de/matterhorn2go/index_en.html>
> [6] 
> https://developer.apple.com/**resources/http-streaming/**examples/<https://developer.apple.com/resources/http-streaming/examples/>
>
>
> On 16.04.2012 17:05, Ruediger Rolf wrote:
>
>> Dear fellow Matterhorn users,
>>
>> as we start to use our Matterhorn 1.3 in these days, I wanted to improve
>> our workflow definitions. I decided that I wanted to use H.264 only, as we
>> luckly updated to a Wowza Media Server [1] that allows us to stream H.264
>> [2].
>>
>> So I created some MP4 encoding profiles, updated the multi-quality
>> workflow definition and created a HD-workflow definition based on
>> multi-quality. These updates are documented here [3].
>>
>> In creating the MP4 encodings I recognized that MP4 behaves quite
>> different from FLV. I don't know how much I like these changes and I must
>> say that FLV had some great features that I currently miss. So what has to
>> be considered when encoding MP4:
>> 1. If you want synchronous playback of two streams the two videos for
>> presenter and presentation need to have the same framerate and GOP
>> structure. If this is not given the videos can be out of sync for several
>> seconds.
>> 2. The Engage Player can only jump to key-frames. These are usually set
>> every 300 frames. That means every 10s on NTSC, 12s on PAL. If you reduce
>> the framerate to save bandwith the intervall may become even greater. You
>> can try to set the key frame interval manually, but the presets may
>> overwrite these changes. The consequence is that when you jump to a chapter
>> in the Matterhorn engage player you will not jump to the exact second but
>> to the last keyframe, that may be several seconds earlier. FLV did not have
>> this problem as the format somehow stores the reference to the keyframes in
>> the metadata.
>> 3. At least in the engage player there seems to be a problem that the
>> h.264 videos are not always lip sync, which means that the delay of audio
>> and video is more than 80ms.
>> 4. There are several "profiles" for H.264. I have not understood the
>> differences between these profiles in depth. The advantage of baseline
>> profile is that it should run on the most devices and is probably hardware
>> accelerated. So at least one of you profiles should be a basline profile.
>> From my subjective tests the lip-sync issues is not that recognizeable on
>> main and high profiles somehow.
>> 5. There are several encoding presets (from ultrafast to veryslow) for
>> x264. There is a dublication of presets ffmpeg has its own which are called
>> with the "-vpre" option and the presets from the x264 codec itself which
>> can be called with the "-preset" option. The vpre-settings create a MP4
>> that is not playable in Flash, so I recommend to use the x264 presets that
>> all seem to work fine. In my tests ultrafast was more than 10x faster than
>> veryslow. From my test-encodings I decided to use the medium setting (2-3x
>> the encoding time of ultrafast), as the video-quality seemed okay for me
>> than, but I might adjust this with more test videos around. (In general the
>> baseline profile encoded 30% in my examples than the other profiles).
>>
>> I hope my findings are helpful to others, as it seemed to me that there
>> was quite a lot chatting on IRC about using H.264.
>>
>> Rüdiger
>>
>>
>> [1] A guide on how to setup Wowza with Matterhorn can be found here:
>> http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/**display/MHDOC/Wowza+Media+**Server+3+v1.3<http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MHDOC/Wowza+Media+Server+3+v1.3>
>> [2] Red5 does not allow seeking in MP4 files somehow.
>> [3] http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/**display/MH/HD-Video+%28720p%**
>> 29+with+H.264+encoding+only<http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/HD-Video+%28720p%29+with+H.264+encoding+only>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Matterhorn-users mailing list
> Matterhorn-users@**opencastproject.org<[email protected]>
> http://lists.opencastproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/**matterhorn-users<http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users>
>
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

Reply via email to