Thanks. Is it by chance that all of these come from the http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Cookbook? We knew this would be different (in that it was written at least with the intention of long-lasting information) and we could exempt parts of the wiki predefined from the archival process. The question is whether we could ask people to identify these ahead of time. Thoughts?
O > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:matterhorn- > [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Greg Logan > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. August 2012 00:53 > An: [email protected] > Cc: Opencast Matterhorn; Matterhorn Users > Betreff: Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] [Opencast] Wiki-gardening ahead - please > read > carefully if you have pages in the wiki you need > > On 12-08-07 04:39 PM, Schulte Olaf A. wrote: > > Hello Tobias > > > > Sorry for the delayed answer. Your comment has sparked discussions in our > little gardening group and we are considering alternatives to the archival > process. > However, in order to better understand your concerns, could you explain what > documentation you expect to be relevant after a year of non-editing? Our idea > was > that these "outdated" (assumption!) documents are partially to blame for the > confusion. But if you can highlight some parts of the wiki where such > documents > still are relevant, this would certainly help us better understand the > situation and > choose instruments accordingly. We certainly don't want to further decrease > the > number of available relevant resources in this... > > I'll jump in here. As some examples: > > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Matterhorn+Static+Resources > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Create+a+Custom+Workflow+Operation+ > Handler > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Documenting+REST+services > > Still relevant in the sense that they're in use in the codebase, although > possibly a > little outdated now. I imagine there are others where having the docs there, > even if > they're outdated, is better than nothing at all. > > G > > > Regards > > > > Olaf A. > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: [email protected] [mailto:community- > >> [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Tobias Wunden > >> Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juli 2012 15:22 > >> An: Opencast Community > >> Betreff: Re: [Opencast] Wiki-gardening ahead - please read carefully > >> if you have pages in the wiki you need > >> > >> Hi Olaf, > >> > >> is there some way to take a look at those pages? The lack of > >> documentation is already hurting all over the place, so I would hate > >> to lose any still relevant piece of it. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tobias > >> > >> On 26.07.2012, at 21:47, Schulte Olaf A. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear All > >>> > >>> In response to discussions we had and feedback we got at the > >>> unconferences in > >> Oxford and Harvard, a communication group was established to improve > >> access to information in the wiki and on the websites. As a first > >> step, we decided to clean up the wikis, automatically archiving (and > >> thus removing from immediate access) pages that haven't been updated > >> during the last 365 days. From our initial analysis, these will be > >> mainly pages from the funded period of the Matterhorn project 2010-2011 > >> that > have no practical relevance today and clutter up our wiki. > >>> > >>> What this means is that August 17th we will ask everyone to stop > >>> editing the wiki > >> for a couple of hours (prior notice will be given) because this might > >> interfere with the automatic archival. Any page that hasn't been > >> touched for a year will be moved to an archive, still accessible for > >> another 400 days - but not appearing in the wiki and/or as a search > >> result anymore. If there are pages you edited, need or love where you > >> think that they might be archived wrongly under these settings, > >> please inform Michelle Ziegmann (CC) in advance - or edit them > >> shortly to fool the archival process. If you find out something is missing > >> that > should be there afterwards, please contact Michelle. > >>> > >>> As indicated, this is only the first step in cleaning up the wikis. > >>> Once old content > >> was removed, we can move more easily and restructure the overall wiki > >> to meet the demand by developers and adopters accordingly. Expect us > >> to come back and inform you about respective changes beforehand. > >>> > >>> Any feedback is welcome. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Opencast gardening team > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Community mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community > >>> > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe please email > >>> [email protected] > >>> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Community mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community > >> > >> > >> To unsubscribe please email > >> [email protected] > >> _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > Community mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/community > > > > > > To unsubscribe please email > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
