[Skipping the community list before boring them to death] I see. So the question is whether you/we would be able to identify these assets individually so we can protect them from archival. Before you say "no" though: The alternative it seems is to manually archive, which means walking through all (!) documents basically.
O > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:matterhorn- > [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Tobias Wunden > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. August 2012 13:14 > An: Opencast Community > Cc: Opencast Matterhorn; Matterhorn Users > Betreff: Re: [Opencast Matterhorn] [Opencast] Wiki-gardening ahead - please > read > carefully if you have pages in the wiki you need > > No. The "system overview" contains "old" documents as well which are still > relevant. > > On 09.08.2012, at 10:40, "Schulte Olaf A." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks. Is it by chance that all of these come from the > http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Cookbook? We knew this would be > different (in that it was written at least with the intention of long-lasting > information) > and we could exempt parts of the wiki predefined from the archival process. > The > question is whether we could ask people to identify these ahead of time. > Thoughts? > > > > O > > _______________________________________________ > Matterhorn mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn > > > To unsubscribe please email > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Matterhorn-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users
