Thanks Michelle, once we've actually got the kit installed I'll do a proper 
write-up with this in mind.

Stuart Phillipson | Media Technologies Coordinator

Room 1.025 Devonshire House
University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL
United Kingdom

e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone: 016130 60478

On 26 Nov 2012, at 17:11, Michelle Ziegmann 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Stuart,

It would be very helpful to the project if you were able to share your 
experiences and put out a plug for Matterhorn on the Opencast website. I invite 
you to write up your PcP to Matterhorn deployment as an article and then you 
and I can work together to publish your case study on the 
opencast.org<http://opencast.org> website.

Thank you!
Michelle


On 11/26/12 3:20 AM, Stuart Phillipson wrote:

Tobias / Greg, you've made a really good points, particularly about the case 
studies. Pretty much everyone in lecture capture links to success stories / 
case studies from their home page. I guess that's what you want to see as a 
potential adopter, the technology worked for someone else with the assumption 
that it will probably work for you.

We're currently working on replacing our Podcast Producer 2 (PcP2) system with 
Matterhorn. It's not exactly the most exciting deployment as we're not really 
focusing on the cool parts of Matterhorn, but I promise to write it up and put 
it in our adopters page. There's still quite a few people using PcP2 and it 
might be relevant for them to see a successful migration to another lecture 
capture platform.

Cheers


Stuart Phillipson | Media Technologies Coordinator

Room 1.025 Devonshire House
University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL
United Kingdom

e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone: 016130 60478

On 23 Nov 2012, at 10:49, Tobias Wunden 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:

Hi Stuart,

thanks for sending this, I couldn't agree more! The point you are making, and 
the one Greg has been referring to as well, is that there are almost no success 
stories being sent back to the community, even though we know that they are out 
there.

So from my point of view it is still valid to point out that Matterhorn is not 
yet the shiny product that others are selling with regards to a polished ui, as 
long as we keep selling the ideas that make Matterhorn a great product: 
extensible architecture, use of open and documente standards, openness in 
general, choice of capture solution, active community of developers and users, 
etc.

Tobias


On 16.11.2012, at 13:04, Stuart Phillipson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:

Hi All,

Ok so a bit of a rant, but I've been to a few conferences / talks / discussion 
and I think we (myself included) might be underselling Matterhorn or 
overstating the competition a bit. When people like Mediasite are talking up 
their products they're not focusing on the areas which (I think) are of real 
concern for us, they're actually talking about stuff that Matterhorn is 
potentially capable of doing much better and I think this might be scaring 
people away. I don't really have a specific goal with this conversation, but 
I'd like to know what people in the community think?

Just look at this for example. Here's a talk I did in Norway and was recorded 
on a dedicated Mediasite box (sorry :' ( you'll have to install Silverlight if 
you want to see it):
http://webtv.uit.no/Mediasite/Play/5e94b90d23ff47a8af0ffbbd437656dc1d?catalog=ce785a7a-45b9-4492-a867-124f50d0139c

The UI might be glossy-ish but the whole experience seems filled with major 
problems. Just for information, they had professional AV staff there on the day 
monitoring everything so if it ever stood a change of working properly it would 
have been then. The VGA signal acquisition is terrible, there's horrible 
compression on the video signal, the same video signal loses audio sync *within 
a single stream*, animation capture and sync is appalling, the constant 
scrolling of the slides is hugely distracting... I could go on. Want to embed 
the video in another page? LOL, better write your own embed code then:
http://www.worldofwebcast.com/post/mediasite-tech-tip-how-to-embed-any-mediasite-webcast

Want to view it on a mobile device? Hahahahah:
http://i.imgur.com/KeC6k.png

If you look around the web there's numerous different installations which all 
have the same problems, it's not just limited to one site's implementation of 
the system. And yet people are willing to by these with a per unit RRP cost of 
$16,000...... sixteen thousand dollars! Per room!

I  guess what I'm trying to get it is that I think the default responses to 
enquires about Matterhorn seem overly conservative when considering the above. 
When I was initially asking around if Matterhorn was any good I commonly heard 
something along the lines of "it has its problems", then followed by a longer 
explanation of some of the issues and the good points. I think this is because 
people are trying to manage expectations and avoid disappointment and I get 
that, I'm just not sure if it helps us to grow the community.

</rant>


Stuart Phillipson | Media Technologies Coordinator

Room 1.025 Devonshire House
University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL
United Kingdom

e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Phone: 016130 60478

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users




_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users


--
Michelle Ziegmann PMP
Technical Project Manager
Educational Technology Services
University of California Berkeley
_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

_______________________________________________
Matterhorn-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn-users

Reply via email to