Hi Chris, > We were chatting on irc today and it came up that ACLs get attached to the > workflow at schedule time and not at processing time. Since there could be a > huge gap between the time something was scheduled and the time it is > processed the acls could have changed quite dramatically. So, is there a > reason that workflows need the ACL at start, and not on ingest?
the reason for this is that these ACLs also determine, who is able to manage the workflows related with a series, not only who can view the recordings. For that reason, there needs to be an ACL in place at the very beginning. Not saying, thought, that it shouldn't be updated once ingest happens. Tobias _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
