Chris, My understanding during the Unconference session was *not* to get rid of the wiki. What I understood about the proposal is to have a static official version of the documentation that matches the actual Matterhorn release that would be approved similar to the way the release is (i.e. QA). The wiki wouldn't be gone as it would be the needed canvas where to update the docs for the upcoming releases and also a space to add new page for say dev recipes.
One way to look at technical documentation writing is to compare it to code writing, with branches, release candidates and official releases, basically versioning, the official release doc being that static document that is pushed to the official channels (i.e. outside of the wiki) at the same time as the official released code. J. On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Michelle Ziegmann wrote: >> Are we talking about abandoning the wiki completely for docs? (I don't >> particularly like this idea) > I think that's the idea, yes. I'd love to hear your thoughts about this, > Chris. It's an idea that came up during the Opencast conference. _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
