>> So our #proposal is to start adding JMX support to Matterhorn and I would >> like to get feedback and/or +/- ones on this suggested approach. > > I like the idea, but have no idea how much work this is going to be. > What kind of timeframe are you thinking of for getting the initial > implementation done? Is this something that touches every bundle (ie, > widespread code changes)?
Not every bundle, but certainly those that are relevant to monitoring, i. e wirkflow, service registry, scheduler, ... The timeframe from my point of view would be to get something in place for 1.5. Tobias _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
