Well, there are JMX to SNMP bridges that will expose your JMX metrics through the SNMP protocol. Again, see the page I was referencing below.
Tobias On 16.03.2012, at 17:28, Christopher Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > Right. Here's the perspective I think is common in ops groups, or at > least is in ours: > > "All in all, I would say that choosing to monitor the JVM through SNMP > is legitimate when: > > .... > > You already have at your disposal SNMP management tools or SNMP > management consoles" > > But I welcome more monitoring regardless, even if we're not likely to > use it due to tool issues. > > Chris > > >> Hi Chris, >> >> it's a valid question, however in my mind you already gave the most >> important hint with respect to that discussion, which is that SNMP is >> really designed for devices rather than applications. Read more on >> JMX vs. SNMP and why JMX makes the most sense for monitoring Java >> applications on [1]. >> >> Tobias >> >> [1] https://blogs.oracle.com/jmxetc/entry/jmx_vs_snmp _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
