+1 from me for using git Rüdiger
On 25.09.2012 19:03, Christoph Drießen wrote:
As a follow up from today's dev meeting I re-post a mail with the title "git again" I've sent to list a couple of month ago. Another good source for getting the advantages of git over svn is this video of Linus Thorvalds speaking at Google. It's a bit long but gives great insight and is also fun to watch. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 Then I'd like to remind that there's a page on the wiki to collect all issues you see around migrating to git. If we want to make the transition everyone should contribute. http://opencast.jira.com/wiki/display/MH/Switching+to+Git Besides the point I've outlined in my re-post below, I'd like to emphasize the superior toolset of git when comes to working with your source code. The fact that everything is local makes it blazingly fast. Digging around in revisions, picking code from another branches, doing code analysis, branching and merging really becomes part of your daily development routine since all those tools run in fractions of a second. Since branching and merging is that easy you'll immediately start to develop in dedicated local development branches. That gives you the benefit of _always_ having a working version at hand. It's just switching branches. There's more to git. Do a bit of googling or just set up a small test repo for yourself and start working with it. After some time you'll be asking yourself how development worked without it. ## re-post The question whether the Opencast project should move to git has already been brought to list several times and has each time been rejected due to good reasons. But with all this GSoC discussion going on and having seen multiple people on list who are willing to contribute I find that it's time to bring it up again. I do not want to write about the differences and -- in my opinion -- advantages of using git over svn once more. This can be read in my predecessors posts on the subject and elsewhere. I just would like to emphasize that one point that makes git so outstanding for me. I see more people wanting to work on Matterhorn but do not have commit rights -- and probably won't ever get. But with git this doesn't really matter. It's an easy go: clone, branch, fetch, work. And if your work results in something that should be contributed back, just ask someone to fetch from you. This process of working is inherent to git. Sure, one can achieve something similar using the git svn bridge like we do at Entwine. But this always feels a bit like a hack, not that natural. And then there is this psychological effect you have with a git based project, which invites people to join be just saying: clone me! The second reason why I'm talking about switching to git is the experience we gained at Entwine working with a dual git/svn setup where developers work solely in git but parts of our work repos are connected to the OC SVN. This doesn't work bad but it feels like having MH git based would be much nicer. I think it would be a good idea to switch to git after the 1.4 release and before GSoC to send out a strong signal that we embrace folks who want to work with us on MH. This leaves us some time to plan the migration and for everybody to check out git. Entwine can share their list of resources to get everybody to learn at least the basics to become productive with git soon. Christoph _______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Matterhorn mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencastproject.org/mailman/listinfo/matterhorn To unsubscribe please email [email protected] _______________________________________________
