Wow thanks Nate for all that information.  This is something that I want 
for Mayan at some point.

--Roberto

On Friday, August 31, 2012 11:11:32 AM UTC-4, Nate Aune wrote:
>
> >*Should a non profit foundation be established and all or some control 
> be transferred to it?  Should copyrights be >transferred too?*
> *
> *
> I served on the Plone Foundation board for 3 years, and I'm very familiar 
> with the benefits of transferring the copyright/trademark to a non-profit 
> foundation. I can say that it helped with receiving donations/grants and 
> strengthening the community as well as reducing risk. 
> http://plone.org/foundation
>
> We had a lot of support from Eben Moglen, the general counsel for the FSF, 
> and here you can read the conservancy proposal:
> http://plone.org/foundation/materials/archive/proposals/conservancy/
> http://plone.org/foundation/materials/archive/conservancy
>
> Nate
>
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:23:18 AM UTC-4, Roberto Rosario wrote:
>>
>> All that has happened in the past 60 hours or so including the results 
>> have show that Mayan EDMS the code, and Mayan EDMS the project, have broken 
>> through any initial expectations of growth, market penetration, acceptance 
>> or any idea I or anyone else may have had from the day it was started or 
>> the day it was released one and a half years ago.  I also think this is an 
>> important pivotal point and the good time to make changes if there is the 
>> need for them to ensure the continued growth and future of the project.
>>
>> I value everyone's opinion and take them into account and the people in 
>> this mailing list are the oldest supporters of the project so your opinions 
>> are specially important and helpful during this process as have been since 
>> the beginning of the project itself.
>>
>> I would like everyone to chime in if they can on the following topics (or 
>> any other you want to bring out):
>>
>> - Should Mayan EDMS be licensed under another Open Source license (BSD, 
>> MIT, Apache, other)?  A non Free license?
>> - Should it remain Free Software or move to a full commercial product.
>> - Should a new specific license be crafted for it (ie: Mayan EDMS Shared 
>> Source License or something like that)
>> - Should the development branch remain open, closed, or shared on a case 
>> by case basis?
>> - Should the release strategy remain the same or should there be 
>> a deferred model of a commercial release and have that same version become 
>> the latest Free Open Source version a period after that (6 month a a year?) 
>> to benefit both commercial and non-commercial users? 
>>  Another completely different release strategy?
>> - Should there continue to be only one version of the Source Code or 
>> should there be a commercial and a community version?
>> - Should there be a completely different release strategy?
>> - Is the current release cycle adequate?  Or Too slow?  Too fast?
>> - Should a non profit foundation be established and all or some control 
>> be transferred to it?  Should copyrights be transferred too?
>> - Is the software/project transparent enough or too much?
>> - Is the new licensing plan proposed (GPL, Redistribution, Commercial and 
>> Developer) adequate, too complicated or too limited?
>>
>> """
>>
>>    - ** GPL ** – You can install *Mayan EDMS* as is, but can sell your 
>>    services for *Mayan EDMS*, you must provide the source code or 
>>    directions where to get the source code to your clients, modifications to 
>>    the source code must be made public.
>>    - ** Redistribution ** - You can sell *Mayan EDMS* as well as your 
>>    services, you can modify *Mayan EDMS* adding new features or changing 
>>    the name and you can keep your changes closed.
>>    - ** Commercial ** – Same as *GPL* but includes email and telephone 
>>    support for a number of hours per month.
>>    - ** Developer ** – Allows you to use *Mayan EDMS* to create a new 
>>    product using all or parts of the source code and allows you to sell your 
>>    new product independently.
>>    - """
>>
>> Any other topic regarding but not limited to code hosting (github, etc), 
>> the current website hosting, website design or anything else is also most 
>> welcomed.
>>
>> Feel free to post or to continue emailing me in private as most have 
>> done, any method is perfectly fine.  Thank you very much,
>>
>> --Robert
>>
>>

-- 



Reply via email to