would i be correct in assuming that this same technique was used for safe signal handling in your SignalMBS plugin ?
> Subject: Re: [MBS] PortaudioMBS UseSafeThreading thread switching latency > From: [email protected] > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:00:37 -0700 > To: [email protected] > > > On Jul 10, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Christian Schmitz wrote: > > > > > Am 10.07.2011 um 03:53 schrieb Dan Stenning: > > > >> I read somewhere in documentation that the process switch delay incurred > >> by using UseSafethreading = true has been reduced from around 10ms down > >> to 1ms for OSX when using Carbonevents. > >> With things going "Cocoa", is there any chance that this latency can be > >> reduced further ? Ideally I would like to be able to process audio down > >> to as little as 64 frame block sizes which is of the order of 1.5ms. > > > > CarbonEvents are available on Cocoa, too. Things will continue to work. > > In fact, the Cocoa event system is currently built on top of CarbonEvents. > > I personally started calling them "CoreEvents" a long time ago. > > -- > Glenn L. Austin, Computer Wizard and Race Car Driver <>< > <http://www.austin-soft.com> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list > [email protected] > https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
