By default, combinatorial test does a pairwise generation of tuples. There's
an option in the attribute ctor to select cartesian product (which will give
8)

On 12/11/06, Todd Menier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks. You understood my question just fine. I must have done something
> else wrong the first time because after because now I am not getting an
> error. However, in every case where I use 3 or more parameters, it is not
> generating as many tests as I would expect, unless I'm misunderstanding the
> functionality.
>
> Here's a very simple example that demonstrates the behavior:
>
> [CombinatorialTest]
> public void MyTest(
>     [UsingLiterals("a;b")] string s1,
>     [UsingLiterals("x;y")] string s2,
>     [UsingLiterals("1;2")] string s3)
> {}
>
> I would expect that this would generate 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 tests. Instead, it
> generates 6 tests:
>
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(a,x,1)
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest (a,x,2)
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,x,1)
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,y,1)
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(a,y,2)
> [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,y,2)
>
> Why are (a,y,1) and (b,x,2) not present?
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Gunnlaugur Thor Briem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It definitely does support more than 2 factory-varied parameters. This
> > is working fine for me:
> >
> >         [CombinatorialTest]
> >         public void TestWeightedValue(
> >             [UsingLiterals("0;1e5;1e7")] double f,
> >             [UsingLiterals("0;1e4;1e6 ")] double i,
> >             [UsingLiterals("0;3e5;7e6")] double v,
> >             [UsingLiterals("5e3;250e3;25e6")] double r
> >             )
> >         {
> >            ....
> >         }
> >
> > Did I misunderstand the problem you're having?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >     - Gulli
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Todd Menier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm relatively new to mbUnit and am really liking the
> > > CombinatorialTest feature. It appears that it doesn't support more than 2
> > > "UsingX" parameters in the test method though. Can anyone recommend a good
> > > approach to testing all possible permutations of 3 or more enumerable
> > > inputs?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Todd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>


-- 
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to