Ah, thank you. Switching to Cartesian is exactly what I was looking for. I
probably should take some time to understand the pairwise generation though.
I'm not even sure how that algorithm works, much less the theories behind
why this gives you "good enough" test coverage most of the time, though a
quick google search did allude to something to that effect.
Thanks again for the help,
Todd
On 12/12/06, Jonathan de Halleux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By default, combinatorial test does a pairwise generation of tuples.
> There's an option in the attribute ctor to select cartesian product (which
> will give 8)
>
> On 12/11/06, Todd Menier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. You understood my question just fine. I must have done something
> > else wrong the first time because after because now I am not getting an
> > error. However, in every case where I use 3 or more parameters, it is not
> > generating as many tests as I would expect, unless I'm misunderstanding the
> > functionality.
> >
> > Here's a very simple example that demonstrates the behavior:
> >
> > [CombinatorialTest]
> > public void MyTest(
> > [UsingLiterals("a;b")] string s1,
> > [UsingLiterals("x;y")] string s2,
> > [UsingLiterals("1;2")] string s3)
> > {}
> >
> > I would expect that this would generate 2 x 2 x 2 = 8 tests. Instead, it
> > generates 6 tests:
> >
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(a,x,1)
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest (a,x,2)
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,x,1)
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,y,1)
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(a,y,2)
> > [success] MyTestFixture.MyTest(b,y,2)
> >
> > Why are (a,y,1) and (b,x,2) not present?
> >
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Gunnlaugur Thor Briem <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > >
> > > It definitely does support more than 2 factory-varied parameters. This
> > > is working fine for me:
> > >
> > > [CombinatorialTest]
> > > public void TestWeightedValue(
> > > [UsingLiterals("0;1e5;1e7")] double f,
> > > [UsingLiterals("0;1e4;1e6 ")] double i,
> > > [UsingLiterals("0;3e5;7e6")] double v,
> > > [UsingLiterals("5e3;250e3;25e6")] double r
> > > )
> > > {
> > > ....
> > > }
> > >
> > > Did I misunderstand the problem you're having?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > - Gulli
> > >
> > > On 12/11/06, Todd Menier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I'm relatively new to mbUnit and am really liking the
> > > > CombinatorialTest feature. It appears that it doesn't support more than
> > > > 2
> > > > "UsingX" parameters in the test method though. Can anyone recommend a
> > > > good
> > > > approach to testing all possible permutations of 3 or more enumerable
> > > > inputs?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Todd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
