On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 12:08 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > > > 1) Support only S-Lang 2 and only as an external library. Those who > > > need mc will get S-Lang. I know, this is pretty harsh, but the next > > > release is probably months away, and S-Lang 2 will be ubiquitous by > > > then. > > > > Most *nix variants have curses implementation. Why all of a sudden > > curses support should be dropped in favour of S-Lang ? > > I think you are misreading proski. I think you should read "only S-Lang > 2" as in contrast to both slang1 and slang2. I don't believe proski > proposes to drop curses support. He can correct me if I'm wrong.
How about this sentence: "Those who need mc will get S-Lang." I don't see it happening. > However, I do not agree with that. The advantage of using an internal > version is that it is more easily patchable than the system library > itself. As I have already told to Roland once - the correct way to fix a bug in a library is to fix the library itself by submitting patches to the correct mailing list. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
