Le lundi 09 mai 2016 à 11:28 +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit : > On Mon, 9 May 2016, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: > > > Done, builds on their way. > > Just make sure that it doesn't pull x11 in the Requires, which > shouldn't > happen, but better check it still. > > > I can send him my updates if you want. > > I certainly wouldn't mind that :-) I'm trying to keep an eye on > downstreams (Debian, Red Hat, Gentoo, Arch), but I only have so much > time > available for the purpose... >
output of ldd with latest build (on C7) : linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff4e172000) libslang.so.2 => /lib64/libslang.so.2 (0x00007f5302ace000) libgpm.so.2 => /lib64/libgpm.so.2 (0x00007f53028c7000) libssh2.so.1 => /lib64/libssh2.so.1 (0x00007f530269c000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f5302498000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x00007f5302161000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f5301f44000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5301b83000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f530197f000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f530167c000) libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007f5301455000) libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f530122b000) libssl.so.10 => /lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007f5300fbd000) libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x00007f5300bd5000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f53009bf000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5302e54000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00007f5300772000) libkrb5.so.3 => /lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00007f530048d000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00007f5300289000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00007f5300056000) libkrb5support.so.0 => /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00007f52ffe47000) libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00007f52ffc43000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007f52ffa28000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib64/libselinux.so.1 (0x00007f52ff803000) libpcre.so.1 => /lib64/libpcre.so.1 (0x00007f52ff5a1000) liblzma.so.5 => /lib64/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007f52ff37c000) It looks like we’re ok when it comes to x11. yum deplist mc confirms that. I’ll mail Jindrich in a couple minutes (you’ll be cc’ed). Best, Laurent. _______________________________________________ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel