Le lundi 09 mai 2016 à 11:28 +0200, Yury V. Zaytsev a écrit :
> On Mon, 9 May 2016, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> 
> > Done, builds on their way.
> 
> Just make sure that it doesn't pull x11 in the Requires, which
> shouldn't 
> happen, but better check it still.
> 
> > I can send him my updates if you want.
> 
> I certainly wouldn't mind that :-) I'm trying to keep an eye on 
> downstreams (Debian, Red Hat, Gentoo, Arch), but I only have so much
> time 
> available for the purpose...
> 

output of ldd with latest build (on C7) :
        linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff4e172000)
        libslang.so.2 => /lib64/libslang.so.2 (0x00007f5302ace000)
        libgpm.so.2 => /lib64/libgpm.so.2 (0x00007f53028c7000)
        libssh2.so.1 => /lib64/libssh2.so.1 (0x00007f530269c000)
        libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
(0x00007f5302498000)
        libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
(0x00007f5302161000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f5301f44000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f5301b83000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f530197f000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f530167c000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00007f5301455000)
        libtinfo.so.5 => /lib64/libtinfo.so.5 (0x00007f530122b000)
        libssl.so.10 => /lib64/libssl.so.10 (0x00007f5300fbd000)
        libcrypto.so.10 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.10 (0x00007f5300bd5000)
        libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f53009bf000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f5302e54000)
        libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /lib64/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
(0x00007f5300772000)
        libkrb5.so.3 => /lib64/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00007f530048d000)
        libcom_err.so.2 => /lib64/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00007f5300289000)
        libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib64/libk5crypto.so.3
(0x00007f5300056000)
        libkrb5support.so.0 => /lib64/libkrb5support.so.0
(0x00007f52ffe47000)
        libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib64/libkeyutils.so.1
(0x00007f52ffc43000)
        libresolv.so.2 => /lib64/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007f52ffa28000)
        libselinux.so.1 => /lib64/libselinux.so.1 (0x00007f52ff803000)
        libpcre.so.1 => /lib64/libpcre.so.1 (0x00007f52ff5a1000)
        liblzma.so.5 => /lib64/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007f52ff37c000)

It looks like we’re ok when it comes to x11. yum deplist mc confirms
that.

I’ll mail Jindrich in a couple minutes (you’ll be cc’ed).

Best,
Laurent.
_______________________________________________
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel

Reply via email to