We're using SpammerTrap from SECNAT and are very pleased with it. Runs
on a dedicated PC in our datacenter but before our firewall and they
actively update and tweak the settings remotely and run interference for
us vis-a-vis the Internet. But we have as much control as we want
internally, so we can globally or even down to an individual basis
maintain white and black lists (we have a few people in marketing who
actually WANT to receive all their spam, though we only allow them to
receive the spam that makes it through the initial screen as harmless).
So, for us, it's a nice combination of hardware-based and actively
maintained pre-firewall screening and interface/representative to the
Internet writ large and a lot of internal flexibility in allowing
customized solutions for our staff. Everyone, for example, gets 2 emails
a day with "questionable" email headers--emails that got picked out at
the very last stage of screening--which one can scan through and delete,
if they're all truly spam (and almost invariably they are), or one can
"release" individual items, which allows them to pass through; and one
can also individually black or white list and i.d. as spam or not spam
each item, if they want to go to that trouble, so that the spam filter
becomes "smarter" over time. Nice because individuals can then help
refine the filters for the institution as a whole, ultimately.

Don't recall the cost, but not unreasonable at all--less than we were
paying for Symantec's product--with an upfront cost (maybe $3k??) and a
modest subscription fee, I think.

Jerry

Jerry Powell
Director of Information Systems
Winterthur Museum & Country Estate
Winterthur, DE 19735
(302) 888-4751



Reply via email to