Perian,

My eyes tend to cross too when people much more knowledgable than I explain
meta-data.   Here's my basic understanding, at least as it applies to
museums

Each field in a collections database is a discrete piece of information
about an object.   In different databases that field can have different
names, but still refer to the same piece of information; e.g, catalogue
number = accession number = number.   So that databases can "talk" to each
other (and people can share information between databases), there needs to
be an overall description of that piece of information.   In this case it
might be "unique identifying number".   Various metadata systems (like MARC,
Dublin Core) have set out lists of those pieces of information (more easily
understood as database fields) and definitions of what they are.  Another
example would be author  = maker = artist; here the metadata descriptor
might be "original creator of object".

You may (not) want to keep in mind that many museums do not use standardized
vocabularies, particularly ones with anthropological, archaeological and
historical collections.   I have worked in institutions where curators from
different collections didn't even use the same set of fields within the same
database, let alone vocabulary :-)

Hope this helps,

janice

Janice Klein
Executive Director, Mitchell Museum of the American Indian
jklein at kendall.edu
www.mitchellmuseum.org


-----Original Message-----
From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Perian Sully
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Museum Computer Network Listserv
Subject: [MCN-L] metadata for dummies


Hi list of smart people much more knowledgeable than me:

I'm trying to wrap my brain around the technical aspects of metadata
sharing and structures, reading though (and not entirely comprehending)
a lot of different sources. As I am a visual, hands-on type learner, I'm
trying to put everything I'm reading into non-technical language this
neophyte can understand. I'm pretty sure I've got #'s 2-4 wrong, but can
anyone help me unravel this....?

1) You have objects. You apply vocabularies to the objects in order to
describe them. The vocabularies facilitate how your object information
is seen by other computers. Examples of Vocabularies are: AAT, ULAN,
Chenhall's

(I understand #1 pretty well. Here's where I start to get lost...)

2) In order for the other computers to understand what you're giving
them, the information needs to be arranged in a specific way. These are
the element sets...? these are MARC, LOC, VRA, Dublin Core

3) Because very few institutions have "pure" collections that fit into
one of the Vocabularies, we can use multiple Vocabularies. Do we use
multiples of #2 as well? These are defined and plugged into the element
sets. They are tagged as belonging to a specific Vocabulary

(I think there's a middle piece in here I'm missing)

4) There is an umbrella structure, the Harvester, which can read #2 and
serve it to the user in readable form. Examples: OAI, MARC (also fits as
a #2), XML

So as you can see, I'm dreadfully muddled. I know it's important to
understand it, but I'm just not able to wrap my head around the various
resources out there. I'm starting to think that Ask A Ninja is more my
level...

Help! and thanks in advance

--

Perian Sully
Collection Database and Records Administrator
Judah L. Magnes Museum
2911 Russell St.
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-549-6950 x 335


_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
Network (http://www.mcn.edu)

To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu

To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.10/541 - Release Date: 11/20/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.11/543 - Release Date: 11/20/2006



Reply via email to