Hi Will, We have used the term "variant of" at CCP in our cataloging practice.
Best, Dianne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ? Dianne Nilsen Head of Digital Initiatives and Imaging Center for Creative Photography The University of Arizona P.O. Box 210103 Tucson, AZ? 85721-0103 ? p. 520-307-2829 f. 520-621-9444 http://www.creativephotography.org -----Original Message----- From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Real, Will Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 12:47 PM To: Museum Computer Network Listserv Subject: [MCN-L] Terminology question On the more esoteric end of things: We are cataloguing a collection of black and white negatives. In many cases there are groups of negatives depicting the same subject. In some of these cases the depictions are very close (for example, multiple takes of a posed studio portrait, multiple takes of a wedding party) and in other cases the relationship is more distant (for example, multiple exposures taken in sequence during the same event). We have been using the term "version" to refer to these. We looked in AAT and found the term "version" under the derivative objects section, and discovered that it is meant to refer to objects that are based on an original, which is really not applicable in our situation since no single negative in these cases can be called the original or primary negative. We are wondering if there is another term we should consider using to describe these relationships and particularly if there are two terms that would permit us to distinguish between the relationships that are very close from those that are looser. Thanks, Will Real Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer Network (http://www.mcn.edu) To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit: http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
