At 07:35 1999-10-15 -0400, you wrote:
> Are there any museums that can claim from such obscure (to the general
>public) materials that they derive even one-tenth of one percent of their
operating
>budget from commercial licensing? I don't have access to museum budgets
but am
>willing to rely upon reports of such income by members of this list.

In a word: yes.

<snip>
>What I am suggesting that that museums should not make it possible
>for scholars to obtain the sole images of objects which leads (IMHO)
directly to the
>sad situation Amalyah Keshet is now addressing. But for granting rights to
only
>selected scholars the museum would have copies of such items to offer
itself and that
>would (hopefully) have a very negative impact on the commercial CD-ROM
product.

No, if we agree to let scholars with very special equipment & lighting make
unique photographs to which they will inherently have copyright, that's
that. We have other images to offer, but not neccessarily ones which could
replace these unique photographs - because we can't afford the very special
equipment!


>The other topic that I think should be addressed in this forum arises from
the reply
>of Richard Rinehart who suggested that museums are really caught in the
middle of
>this dicussion, <snip> 

Yes, they are, in that they are both owners/sellers and consumers/buyers.
When pitting museums against scholars in these discussions, we forget that
museums ARE scholars. Well, their curators are. They do research and
original scholarly writing, and they have to order and pay for images, too,
respect other scholars's copyrights, and perhaps also license images for
use in a particular museum publication. Want figures?  We recently paid out
nearly $30,000 for copyright clearances for a major modern art catalogue.
We're on both sides of the fence, which gives us a pretty good perspective
on the issue.




amalyah keshet
head of visual resources, the israel museum, jerusalem
board of directors, the museum computer network
chair, mcn intellectual property special interest group
[email protected]



Reply via email to