For donors, our collections information system is what Robert refersto as our 
"corporate" database. We maintain the current contactinformation for all donors 
in this system. New donors or changes toexisting donor contact information is 
forwarded to the membership anddevelopment office each month following our 
acquisitions committeemeeting.
Changes to contact information also often comes through the membershipand 
development office, and this is passed on to registration as itoccurs. The most 
recent date is considered the authoritative version.Synchronization is 
difficult nonetheless and therefore the transfersof information are entrusted 
to one person who does cross-checks thedata to ensure that both systems are 
using the most currentinformation.
Chuck Patchdirector of systemsThe Historic New Orleans Collectionwww.hnoc.org
On 9/29/05, Robert Weiner <[email protected]> wrote:>> Renee,>> My clients 
have used three options:> The least technical one is to institute a set of 
rules stating that one> database is the "corporate" database.  It's the one 
that will be used for> all mailings.  All address changes must be entered 
there, and when there's a> conflict, that database is presumed to be the 
accurate one.>> The next option is to maintain separate databases but build 
bridges between> them.  Changes made in one database (which might still be the 
corporate> database) are synchronized with the others.  Again, you'll need a 
good set> of rules to keep the sync process from deleting good data.>> The 
third option is to replace your various databases with one system that> does it 
all.  In addition to selecting and converting to the system, you'll> need to 
develop policies about how departments share data.  In a shared> system, one 
department can change contact info that another believes is> correct.  These 
are the mirror images of the policies you need for the first> option.>> 
Robert>> __________________________>> Robert L. Weiner Consulting>> Providing 
Strategic Technology Consulting to Nonprofits and Education> San Francisco, 
CA>> [email protected]> 415/643-8955>> www.rlweiner.com>>> -----Original 
Message-----> From: Rossi, Lindsey [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of 
Montgomery, Renee> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 4:29 PM> To: 
[email protected]> Subject: Donor Information Maintenance>>>>>>> I'm wondering how 
other museums keep donor information up-to-date between> your various internal 
databases.  For instance we have separate databases> for our collection, and 
membership and development records - which don't> speak to each other.  Often 
the same donor's name will appear in both> databases as an art donor as well as 
a cash donor or member.  Sometimes our> Membership and Development office has 
the most up-to-date address, sometimes> the Registrar's office does.  Do you 
have any special protocol between> Registration and Membership & Development, 
so that you don't have to> re-check an address each time you send?>>>> Renee 
Montgomery>> Asst. Director, Collections Management and Information>> 
[email protected]>>>>  ---> You are currently subscribed to mcn_mcn-l as: 
[email protected]> To unsubscribe send a blank email to> 
[email protected]>  --->  You are 
currently subscribed to mcn_mcn-l as: [email protected]>  To unsubscribe 
send a blank email to> 
[email protected]��آ��y˫����+.n�+�����������Z���jw~'�w���_�z�^ɩ�yۓ��칻�&ޱ��i�Z�G�j)m�W����r�r��]��N6/�b���������'�栕��

Reply via email to