Someone wrote: > > | That isn't Psychoacoustics! Psychoacoustics is in fact the complete > | opposite! > > I think the other poster might have meant "psychosomatics." You believe > something, so your body reacts accordingly. > Then there is the psychoceramic too. Isn't that what some of the audiophiles are? Maybe some of us MDer besides! Psychoceramic-- crackpot. -- Jim Coon Not just another pretty mandolin picker. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet? My first web page http://www.tir.com/~liteways ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in b... las
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in b... dattier
- Re: MD: sound quality difference... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... Stainless Steel Rat
- MD: CD quality compared to M... las
- Re: MD: CD quality compared ... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blank... J. Coon
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in b... las
- Re: MD: sound quality difference... PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... J. Coon
- Re: MD: sound quality differ... las
- MD: So old !!! Peter Forest
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Charles Redell
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? PrinceGaz
- Re: MD: sound quality difference in blanks? Dave Kimmel
