===================================================
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===================================================
i guess my point is the track record there kinda scares me. if i owned 5
different unit's and all but 1 had problems, i'm going to greatly consider
going with something else. I'm definately still looking at sony, but really
dont get the best feeling honestly when talking about thier car decks. Yes
they probably have improved, but to what extent? anyone who own's something
other than a sony car MD deck i would like to know your impressions too.
thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Mackay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 1:46 AM
Subject: RE: MD: sony car decks
>
> ===============BEGIN QUOTE==================
> Yes, I have had the same problems.
> I have owned:
> MDX-U1
> MDX-C150 (two of them)
> MDX-400
> MDX-C7900 (still own)
> MDX-65 (still own)
>
> All but the C7900 and MDX-65 has had problems reading recordable MD's,
> but no trouble with prerecorded ones.
> ===========CUT
> CUT=====================
> These problems are NOT specific to car units though, I have had an
> MZ-E3, MZ-R2, and two MDS-501's that had these very same problems.
> =================END QUOTE================
>
> This is because of the fact that the units were of earlier design and Sony
> hadn't learnt from "field experience" about anything that could go wrong
> with the equipment. The MDX-c7900 and MDX-65 were designed around many
years
> of improvement and customer / repairer feedback.
>
> Simon Mackay
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
