Hi Jonathon,

Jonathan Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:08:51AM +0100, max at bruningsystems.com wrote:
>   
>>
>>> ::walk kmem -n kmem_alloc_8192
>>>       
>
> My proposed walker doesn't actually have a '-n' argument;  it seems redundant
> given the "::walk kmem_alloc_8192" walker.
>
>   
I based the "-n" argument on these lines in the new kmem.c

 338 kmem_cache_help(void)
 339 {
 340         static const mdb_help_def_t options[] = {
 341                 { "-n name", "Name of kmem cache (or partial name 
to match)." },
 342                 { NULL, NULL }
 343         };

So this is only for ::help kmem_cache ?

thanks,
max



Reply via email to