Hi Jonathon, Jonathan Adams wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:08:51AM +0100, max at bruningsystems.com wrote: > >> >>> ::walk kmem -n kmem_alloc_8192 >>> > > My proposed walker doesn't actually have a '-n' argument; it seems redundant > given the "::walk kmem_alloc_8192" walker. > > I based the "-n" argument on these lines in the new kmem.c
338 kmem_cache_help(void) 339 { 340 static const mdb_help_def_t options[] = { 341 { "-n name", "Name of kmem cache (or partial name to match)." }, 342 { NULL, NULL } 343 }; So this is only for ::help kmem_cache ? thanks, max