Thanks. Regarding ‘doubling the apps’, have a look at this article ;) 
http://www.david-obrien.net/2014/01/24/convert-configmgr-applications-packages-powershell/
 

 

David

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jeffrey Hunt
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 7:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

just read that the other day David. Great post.

 

When using the Packages model and application model, you only have to double up 
on the SCCM console side. Where I use to work, we used the same files as the 
source for the application and package. We used the packages in OSD to always 
deploy the latest. The application would be used to version control and 
in-place "upgrade" (I say upgrade but we would uninstall/install). hope that 
quick memory dump helps.

 

when using the application model, the most important thing is to ensure that 
dependencies and supersedence within the application is carefully monitored. 
document everything.

 

On 16 April 2014 08:39, obrien.david <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Hi, 

I wrote a bit about this topic in this article: 
http://www.david-obrien.net/2014/04/05/applications-vs-packages-configmgr-package-model-wont-go-anywhere/

 

Cheers

David

 

 

Sent from Samsung Mobile



-------- Original message --------
From: "Marcum, John" 
Date:16/04/2014 01:44 (GMT+10:00) 
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations? 

+1

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:14 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

Chalk it up to another feature in SCCM that doesn’t work well.  Add metering, 
asset intelligence, multicast…etc.

 

Mark Kent (MCP)

Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer

Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 11:07 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

I've heard of several folks that do not use app model for OSD. I use packages 
for OSD myself and apps for everything else.

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:16 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

But if you want to take advantage of the app model, you would have to double up 
your work then (make one Application and one Package) for each application you 
need to install (via normal deployment and OSD).  That’s a lot of extra work 
for us, I was hoping to use the App model for as many installs as possible.

 

Mark Kent (MCP)

Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer

Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Nackers
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:25 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

I can’t think of any specific limitation, I’ve done 50+ in the past with 
packages. It could very well be related to the app-model specifically. Which to 
be honest, has given me nothing but grief in OSD. I don’t use the app model 
anymore in OSD if I can help it, I create packages for everything because I can 
guarantee it’ll work 100% of the time, I can’t do that with the app model.

 

They did change around the logic, which is why you have only 9 per step and MDT 
has to convert from the 2 digit list to the 3 digit list. So it’s possible 
there is something in there.  

 

Or I’m totally wrong on all accounts :) 

 

Chris Nackers

Microsoft MVP – Enterprise Client Management

Email:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Nackers Consulting Services, LLC

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent, Mark
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:57 AM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: [MDT-OSD] Install Applications TS step - limitations?

 

Is there a limitation on the number of apps that can be installed using this TS 
step and the dynamic variables list?  I have a couple Roles in the MDT Db for 
some labs that require large application installs (we are talking over 40 
apps).  When trying to run this, the Install Applications step fails with the 
same message:

 

“App policy for 'ApplicationNameHere' not received. Make sure the application 
is marked for dynamic app install”

 

The Application is marked for dynamic app installs.  If I run the application 
in another role with just a handful of apps, it works fine.  I upgraded SCCM R2 
to CU1  today as I thought there was a known issue with this.  However after 
applying it and getting the agent updated I’m still getting this error.  It 
just seems to arbitrarily pick one app to throw the error on.  Anyone else come 
across this?

 

Mark Kent (MCP)

Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer

Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State

 

 

  _____  


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

 

  _____  


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

 

  _____  


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

 

  _____  


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

 


Reply via email to