Or you learn all of the quirks and what to do to get around or work with them.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Kent, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > So we either move away from the new app model, and lose all it's > positives. Or make packages and apps for every software application, > doubling work and disk space. Ugh... > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ------------------------------ > From: Johan Arwidmark <[email protected]> > Sent: 1/28/2015 8:31 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Problem with App role > > Don’t use apps, use packages in the task sequence and I guarantee the > problem goes away. > > > > / Johan > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Kent, Mark > *Sent:* den 28 januari 2015 20:18 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [MDT-OSD] Problem with App role > > > > We are running SCCM 2012 R2 CU1, on Server 2012 and SQL 2012, with MDT > 2013 integrated. We use roles with SCCM2012 apps in them that are attached > to PC’s. From time to time, the install apps sequence will fail, and when > you look at the SMSTS log it will state “App policy for 'APP_NAME_HERE' not > received. Make sure the application is marked for dynamic app install.” Of > course, the apps in question are marked for install in a task sequence so > that makes no sense. In a pinch, I just recreate the application and that > pretty much always works. However I have a role for a lab that has around > 30 apps in it, and it’s bombing on about 8 of the apps with the same > error. I really don’t want to keep having to recreate the apps. Does > anyone have any rhyme or reason as to why this is happening, or what might > be the problem? Thanks. > > > > Mark Kent (MCP) > > Sr. Desktop Systems Engineer > > Computing & Technology Services - SUNY Buffalo State > > > -- Isaac Holmes IT Engineering Specialist University of Notre Dame 320 IT Center Notre Dame, IN 46556 (574) 631-3254
