John, What I'm referring to is basically reducing topological distance between relevant nodes (ie. co-location, alternative network routes), or changing means/medium (copper vs fiber vs microwave). For instance microwave has gained a lot of popularity recently due to the speed of propagation of radio waves in air vs light in a fiber wire. There's a lot of interesting articles on the topic, just Google it. Also transmission technology (ie. Infiniband) may make a difference. Hope this helps
On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, 12:19 John Hening, <gocio...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Tangentially, there's more to gain from shaving off latency on network >> paths than there is from affinitizing work to cores/dies. But that's >> digressing from the OP. >> > > @Wojciech Kudla, > > That's digressing but it is very interesting. Can you refer me somewhere > where I could read more about it? [If you don't mean solutions based on > bypass-kernel-network-stack-using-hardware] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mechanical-sympathy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to mechanical-sympathy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mechanical-sympathy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mechanical-sympathy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
