Not sure if helps, but a colleague of mine wrote a series of block posts
about the PTP implementation that we used to meet a suite of regulatory
requirements.

https://www.lmax.com/blog/staff-blogs/2016/04/08/solving-mifid-ii-clock-synchronisation-minimum-spend-part-7/

Mike.

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 04:26, Florian Enner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Adding to this, synchronization of distributed clocks is very important in
> the embedded/automation world and is usually done using IEEE 1588v2
> <https://wiki.mef.net/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=29230774> (PTP) which
> can get to sub-microsecond levels. A lot of microprocessors have hardware
> support for it, but I have never looked into how difficult it'd be to get
> running on a server.
>
> - Florian
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 6:00:19 PM UTC+2, Todd Lipcon wrote:
>>
>> https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi18/nsdi18-geng.pdf is
>> also a recent research paper on a similar topic which might be an
>> interesting read if you are interested in time synchronization.
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:47 AM Gil Tene <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The mean end-to-end (from writing to a socket to reading from a socket),
>>> round-trip latency across a modern 10G+ can be brought down to 30-40usec on
>>> modern hardware with relatively low effort or specialized  equipment (e.g.
>>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-to-achieve-low-latency/), and can be
>>> driven as low as 3-5 usec with specialized hardware and software stacks
>>> (kernel bypass, etc) (e.g.
>>> http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/whitepapers/HP_Mellanox_FSI%20Benchmarking%20Report%20for%2010%20%26%2040GbE.pdf
>>> ).
>>>
>>> A trivial round trip ("what time do you have? [my time is X]" to "My
>>> clock shows Y for your request sent at X" [recieved at Z]". would allow you
>>> to measure the delta between the perceived wall clock difference between
>>> two machines to within the round trip latency. e.g. The difference between
>>> the clocks (at the time measured) in the above sequence is known to be
>>> (Z-Y) +/- (Z-X). You can use various statistical techniques to more closely
>>> estimate the bound when repeating the round trip queries many times and
>>> across periods of time. E.g. the amazingly effective techniques used
>>> (decades ago) by NTP to synchronize clocks to within milliseconds across
>>> wide geographical distances and slow/jittery networks still apply even at
>>> low latency scales (e.g. start with something like
>>> http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo.htm or
>>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/press/internet-protocol-journal/back-issues/table-contents-58/154-ntp.html
>>> and dig into references if interested).
>>>
>>> Keep in mind that at the levels you are looking at clock skew and drift
>>> are very real things. And then there is jitter...
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 5:05:22 AM UTC-7, Himanshu Sharma wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As the title suggests, consider 2 servers connected via an L3 switch.
>>>> How can we find the absolute time difference between the clocks running on
>>>> the servers. I want to go as close as possible.
>>>>
>>>> Actually syncing the clocks is not possible due to some constraints so
>>>> I want to know the time difference. Is there any opensource tool I can use
>>>> readily.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "mechanical-sympathy" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "mechanical-sympathy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mechanical-sympathy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to