Posted by: Ulil Abshar-Abdalla
  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:31 pm (PST) 

  Barack Obama difitnah oleh Fox News baru-baru ini: dia "dituduh" pernah 
sekolah di SD Islam yang orientasinya radikal waktu kecil di Jakarta dulu, 
seperti disinggung dalam berita yang saya kirim di bawah ini. Fox News jelas 
media sekuler. Tapi, anehnya, cara2 dia
yang memakai fitnah seperti ini juga dilakukan oleh banyak media yang konon 
"Islami" di Jakarta.
   
  Sementara itu, fitnah yang beredar lewat internet, sudah tak kepalang 
tanggung jumlahnya.
  Memang, watak manusia memang suka fitnah, tampaknya. Hanya saja, ada dua 
jenis fitnah: fitnah dengan motivasi agama, dan fitnah dengan motifasi sekuler. 
Tapi, dua-duanya tetap saja fitnah.
   
  Ulil
   
  Ulil Abshar-Abdalla
Department of Religion
Boston Universit
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
   
  Lessons for Media in Obama Case
  By DAVID BAUDER AP Television Writer
   
  NEW YORK, January 27 (AP) - U.S. Sen. Barack Obama  hardly could have 
anticipated that the first minor media crisis of his presidential bid would 
involve where he went to school at age 7. The Illinois Democrat's welcome into 
the world of modern campaign coverage last week offers lessons for both 
candidates and reporters on the marathon run until November 2008. And it's 
undoubtedly a sign of things to come.
   
  Chances are "about 100 percent" that a candidate will be ruined by a story 
that he or she hasn't anticipated, said ABC News political reporter Jake Tapper.
   
  Stories seemingly trivial or even untrue will appear instantly and 
reverberate madly through the media. Candidates most skillful in anticipating 
them and reacting swiftly will have a big advantage. A magazine article's 
charge that Obama had attended a radical Islamic school while living in 
Indonesia as a boy was spread on blogs and, most prominently, on Fox
News Channel.
   
  Other news organizations sent reporters who learned the school in Jakarta was 
public and secular and has long accepted students of all faiths. CNN's Anderson 
 Cooper seemed to relish sticking the knife in a rival.

  "That's the difference between talking about news and reporting it," he said. 
"You send a reporter, check the facts and you decide at home." CNN had time to 
do that because it wasn't a hard news story, said Sam Feist, the network's 
political director.
   
  "One of the things that's dangerous about a presidential campaign when it 
comes to the facts is the echo chamber, where one news organization reports a 
story and it's not true, and one outlet picks it up, another picks it up and 
another," Feist said. "Before
long the public assumes that it's true even when it's not."
   
  Tapper wrote about the story, with the Obama campaign's denials, on his blog 
when it first
surfaced. But like CNN, it didn't appear on the air at ABC until after a 
reporter had gone to
Jakarta.
   
  Whether the same caution would have held a year later, if the charges had 
surfaced in the few days between the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire 
primary, is an open question.
   
  "A long and protracted campaign like we're going to see means you're going to 
have long periods with not much news and news outlets are going to want to fill 
the void," said Tom Rosenstiel, a former political reporter for the Los Angeles 
Times and now director of
the Project for Excellence in Journalism. "In some ways, there are more 
openings for opposition research, dirty tricks, to get into play."
   
  Back in 1992, when the story first surfaced about Bill Clinton and his 
alleged affair with Gennifer Flowers, a reporter asked him about it one day and 
received a response. Yet the story was left off all three network newscasts 
that evening.
   
  That notion of restraint, of major news organizations taking time to weigh 
the newsworthiness of these kinds of stories, seems almost impossible to 
imagine today.
  Before the Internet's spread, a newsroom used to have only a handful of news 
sources coming into their computers, said Marty Ryan, political director at Fox 
News Channel.
   
  "Now there are hundreds, thousands," he said. "Many of them have a political 
agenda and many of them have different standards for what they put on their 
blogs and their Internet sites. We just have to be real careful about what 
happens in the future."
   
  Being careful about the facts is a lesson drummed into every journalist. But 
opinion-based talk shows aren't run by journalists. They're a staple of Fox's 
lineup and spreading around other cable news outlets.
   
  "You can't say it's right or wrong, it's just different," Ryan said. "We 
acknowledge that. We
acknowledged the error with the Obama thing and let's just move on."
   
  Television quickly magnifies stories that might have been forgotten or not 
even noticed otherwise, with Howard Dean's scream an infamous example. 
Remember: Most Americans did not have three cable news networks in their homes 
until the 2000 campaign.
   
  Similarly, it wasn't too long ago that the only Web site political 
professionals watched carefully was the Drudge Report. Now, there are dozens of 
political blogs that must be monitored.
   
  Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, an expected GOP presidential candidate, has 
gone out of his way to cultivate relationships with prominent bloggers. He 
learned their bite earlier this month when a Massachusetts gadfly, Brian 
Camenker, wrote a lengthy report questioning Romney's conservative 
qualifications that spread quickly on the Web.
   
  Most campaigns have opposition research staff, whose job it is to search for 
damaging information about an opponent. The smart candidates do aggressive 
opposition research on themselves, so as not to be surprised by anything. 
Campaigns are actually less likely now to feed damaging material to mainstream 
news organizations, Tapper said. The campaigns prefer the blogs.
   
  "There are so many ways to get information out to people -- whether or not 
that information is true," said Elizabeth Wilner, chief of NBC News' political
unit.
   
  Many Democrats believe that John Kerry's inability to respond quickly to an 
unanticipated story -- charges by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth that he 
didn't      deserve his Vietnam War medals -- doomed his 2004 campaign. Swift 
response is now valued. So is aggressive response.
   
  Still, the political whirlwind may not slow down because of the Obama example.
  "I honestly think that no one is going to be chastened by anything this 
year," Rosenstiel said.

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Kirim email ke