October 28, 2008

Big Tech Companies Back Global Plan to Shield Online Speech
By MIGUEL HELFT and JOHN MARKOFF
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/28/technology/internet/28privacy.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=technology&pagewanted=print


SAN FRANCISCO — Google, Microsoft and Yahoo and a group of human rights 
and public interest organizations plan to introduce Wednesday a global 
code of conduct that they say will better protect online free speech and 
privacy against government intrusion.

The principles are the starting point for a new effort, called the 
Global Network Initiative, which commits the companies to “avoid or 
minimize the impact of government restrictions on freedom of 
expression,” according to a final draft of documents obtained by The New 
York Times.

Stating that privacy is “a human right and guarantor of human dignity,” 
the initiative commits the companies to try to resist overly broad 
demands for restrictions on freedom of speech and overly broad demands 
that could compromise the privacy of their users.

The initiative was begun after human rights groups and Congress 
criticized the Internet companies for cooperating with Chinese 
government censorship and demands for information on dissidents. In 
addition to laying out the code of conduct, the initiative will provide 
a non-governmental forum for the companies and human rights groups to 
jointly resist demands for censorship. It will also establish a system 
of independent auditors to rate the companies’ conduct.

“This is an important first step in providing standards for free 
expression and privacy that obligate companies to do more to challenge 
government restrictions,” said Michael Posner, president of Human Rights 
First, who agreed to discuss the initiative after The Times obtained the 
documents. “It sets up an accountability mechanism that will allow each 
of the companies to be evaluated over time.”

In addition to the three American companies, two European 
telecommunications companies, France Télécom and Vodafone, are also 
considering participating. And members of the initiative are hoping to 
recruit additional companies.

So far, AT&T, Verizon Communications and Sprint Nextel, which were 
embarrassed in 2005 after it was discovered they were cooperating with 
the National Security Agency in a warrantless surveillance scheme by the 
Bush administration, have not signed on.

The principles have the backing of prominent human rights organizations, 
including the Committee to Protect Journalists, Human Rights Watch and 
Human Rights in China. Business for Social Responsibility and the Center 
for Democracy and Technology helped lead the two-year talks, and 
organizations like Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and 
Society and the Calvert Group, a socially responsible money manager, 
also participated.

But the effort is already being criticized by some human rights activists.

“After two years of effort, they have ended up with so little,” said 
Morton Sklar, executive director of the World Organization for Human 
Rights USA. “It is really very little more than a broad statement of 
support for a general principle without any concrete backup mechanism to 
ensure that the guidelines will be followed.”

Currently Google, Microsoft’s MSN division and Yahoo’s Chinese affiliate 
are all cooperating with the Chinese government’s demands that search 
results be filtered. This month, Canadian researchers revealed that the 
Chinese version of the Skype Internet chat and telephony client had been 
modified to permit the logging of chat sessions and storage of the 
information on server computers belonging to Skype’s Chinese partner, 
Tom, a wireless and Internet company.

Yahoo has been harshly criticized for its decision in 2004 to help 
Chinese authorities identify Shi Tao, a Chinese business reporter, who 
had sent a brief of a government document calling for press censorship 
to his private Yahoo e-mail account. Mr. Shi is now serving a 10-year 
prison sentence.

Asked whether the principles would have made a difference in the Shi 
case, Mr. Sklar said, “My guess is it wouldn’t have had any effect at all.”

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204 
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to