Stopping Google

With one company now the world's chief gateway to information, some 
critics are hatching ways to fight its influence

By Drake Bennett  |  June 22, 2008

GOOGLE MAY BE widely admired for its technical wizardry and its 
quick, accurate search engine, but one of the company's most 
impressive accomplishments has been its ability to grow as powerful 
as it is while still remaining, in the minds of most Americans, 
fundamentally likable.

The company today is a behemoth, with more than 15,000 employees and 
a market value as big as Coca-Cola and Boeing combined. Its search 
engine is the tool of first resort for expert researchers and 
schoolkids alike; for suspicious employers, first-daters, long-lost 
friends, blackmailers, reporters, and police investigators - in 
short, for seekers of any and all sorts of information. In April, the 
most recent month for which it compiled statistics, Nielsen Online 
found that 62 percent of all US Internet searches were done using 
Google. Yahoo, the next largest player, had only 17.5 percent of the 
market.

Despite its size and dominance, Google has avoided the public 
suspicion and vilification that have plagued powerful companies from 
Standard Oil to Microsoft. Instead, protected by its reputation for 
innovation, its famed "Don't Be Evil" mantra, and the ever-improving 
precision of its search engine, Google has remained for the most part 
a trusted, even a beloved, brand.

But as Google's influence grows, a number of scholars and programmers 
have begun to argue that the company is acquiring too much power over 
our lives - invading our privacy, shaping our preferences, and 
controlling how we learn about and understand the world around us. To 
counter its pervasive effects, they are developing strategies to push 
back against Google, dilute its growing dominance of the information 
sphere, and make it more publicly accountable. The solutions range 
from programs one can install on one's computer to proposed laws 
forcing Google to reveal parts of its proprietary search algorithm. A 
few experts and privacy activists are pushing for public funding for 
alternative search technologies, and one legal scholar wants to give 
individuals and companies a "right of reply" when searches bring up 
sites that slander them or appropriate their intellectual property.

...

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/06/22/stopping_google/
***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to