Art Review
Why University Museums Matter

By HOLLAND COTTER
The New York Times
February 20, 2009

NEW HAVEN - Cease and desist is the advice I give university 
administrators toying with thoughts of closing their campus museums 
and peddling the art, as Brandeis recently threatened to do. Just 
stop. Period. Bad way to go.

If it helps, consider your museum and its collection in purely 
materialistic terms, as a big chunk of capital, slowly and 
fortuitously accumulated. Once spent, it is irrecoverable. Your 
university can never be that rich in that way again. Or view the art 
in your care as something that doesn't belong to you. Like any legacy 
it belongs to the future.

Such thoughts came to mind on a recent visit to campus museums and 
galleries at Yale University that have exceptional shows this winter. 
One, devoted to Picasso and writing, is drawn almost entirely from 
the university's permanent collections. Another, on the role of tea 
in Japanese culture, is composed primarily of objects on loan from a 
single Yale alumnus. A third, imported from another university 
museum, brings together Degas, geology and gorillas to celebrate 
Charles Darwin's 200th birthday. And they are supplemented by a tidy 
roundup of contemporary Indian artists.

All the shows are fairly small. All are, in different ways, 
beautiful. All are closely researched studies on fascinating subjects 
we know too little about. Yet each is just a shade too specialized or 
unglamorous or experimental to find a home in our public art 
institutions. If it weren't for academic museums, these shows 
wouldn't happen. And that would be a real loss.

...

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/arts/design/20yale.html

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to