http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?document_id=2012609297&zsection_id=2008831910&slug=edit13regs&date=20100812
Remember, the FCC works for the public

THE clear intent of the Federal Communications Commission to exclude consumers 
from discussions 
about how the Internet should be regulated was revealed
by the troubling Google and Verizon communiqué.

Before Monday's announcement, the FCC had been having closed-door meetings with 
companies about 
future regulatory guidelines for broadband. As those talks
stalled, Google and Verizon issued their own vision for segregated, 
higher-speed channels of 
service apart from public networks.

The FCC, under Chairman Julius Genochowski, has been engaged in a bureaucratic 
charade. No 
amount of public workshops and studies can mask the fact the
FCC was privately soliciting direction from industry leaders. Consumers — 
ratepayers and 
taxpayers — were expediently pushed to the sidelines.

For all of the technical exotica of expanding broadband-service options, this 
is fundamentally a 
consumer issue about who pays for what. This goes to the
heart of Net neutrality concerns about open access for content providers and 
customers.

These cozy dealings between regulators and the regulated resonate with 
Americans still reeling 
from the consequences of the failure of federal authorities
and Congress to maintain any credible oversight of financial institutions.

Solemn pledges by online service providers and the nation's biggest 
communications companies to 
honor equal access to the Internet ring hollow as discussions
turn toward creating new pay-to-play categories for the future.

The nation has been ill-served by lax public policy about media consolidation, 
and now there is 
an effort in the benign guise of service expansion to erect,
as appropriately suspicious critics suspect, "tollbooths on the information 
superhighway."

All of the technology embodied by the Internet, and consumers' embrace of the 
opportunities, 
thrived because of open access to new ideas, devices and software.

The FCC must assert its regulatory prerogatives over broadband and seek 
clarifying authority 
where the rules need to be sorted out. The FCC is not an agent
of the industries it oversees. President Obama and Chairman Genochowski need to 
remember whom 
they work for.

The customers will not forget.

Copyright © The Seattle Times Company
Ray T. Mahorney
WA4WGA

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to