U.S. Acts to Quiet Blaring TV Ads. Welcome to the 1960s

By John C Abell
Wired News

September 30, 2010 | 3:42 pm

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/09/fcc-quiet-blaring-tv-ads/


The days of leaping for your TV remote to lower the volume when an ad 
blares decibels louder than the show you’re watching may be coming to an 
end — just in time to be utterly irrelevant.

The U.S. Senate on Wednesday passed a bill (S. 2847) requiring that the 
FCC ban the decades-old practice by which broadcasters pump up the 
volume on ads so they are much, much louder than the programs they 
sponsor. It’s very attention-getting, which is the idea. It’s also 
extremely annoying, which isn’t.

The CALM Act (Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation) would 
require the FCC to enforce “internationally accepted standards of 
television advertisement volumes” within a year of becoming law. A 
version of the act had already passed in the House of Representatives, 
where it will return for reconciliation with the Senate bill. Supporters 
hope for a final vote next month. It’s hard to imagine President Obama 
not signing it.

While this may have been a cause for national celebration in simpler 
times, the parade has largely moved on. We are now armed with the tools 
to ignore TV ads in the broadcast-cable-satellite realm: If ad aversion 
is your thing, do yourself a favor and buy a TiVo box, or at least rent 
your provider’s DVR. Many high-end entertainment systems already have 
the capacity to moderate volume on the fly. And perhaps more to the 
point, we are marching steadily (if still slowly) to a time-shifted, 
on-demand video universe where a) traditional programming is just a 
small slice of what you do with what you might still call your TV set, 
and b) you don’t use a TV set at all to “watch TV.”

Still, it probably comes as a surprise to most that the FCC — which can 
fine a broadcaster hundreds of thousands of dollars if someone uses a 
curse word on the air that you hear 10 times a day or has a wardrobe 
malfunction that you can’t actually see without a DVR — does not have 
the power to order stations it regulates to regulate ad volume, which 
affects everyone, every day.

They do have a web page on subject which gives a tutorial on the mute 
button, says “too loud” is a matter of opinion and urges people to 
contact individual stations to complain.

But the bill does not and can’t address how ads — volume or otherwise — 
are handled in the digital realm, and that’s where the real action will 
be. Even Hulu Plus, which charges $10 a month if you can get an invite, 
has ads. They are more limited, but guess what? You can’t bypass them, 
at all. While you can pause and scrub forward and back on programming, 
you are a captive audience to the ads. Also, they are (in this 
reporter’s anecdotal experience, at least) louder than the programming, 
just like on the TV.

And since streaming services are often used with earphones — well, you 
get the idea.

And since online services are not a broadcast medium, the FCC has no 
authority over them, meaning the future of commercials is likely to 
sound just as loud as the past did.

Read More 
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/09/fcc-quiet-blaring-tv-ads/#ixzz117omwnMo

-- 
========================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to