Free Net TV threatens telecoms and cable

By Marguerite Reardon
News.com

http://news.com.com/Free+Net+TV+threatens+telecoms+and+cable/2100-1034_3-6060306.html

Story last modified Wed Apr 12 14:04:08 PDT 2006



Walt Disney's bold move to let people download TV shows for free could 
spell trouble for cable and satellite providers, but it also throws into 
question the strategy of telephone companies spending billions to get into 
the paid TV business.

On Monday, Disney-owned ABC announced plans to put "Lost," "Desperate 
Housewives," "Alias" and "Commander-in-Chief" on the Internet for free as 
part of a two-month trial beginning in May. The Net-accessible episodes, 
which will be available the day after the shows air, will be archived so 
viewers can watch any shows they miss.

Viewers will access the shows on the ABC Web site where they'll be able 
fast-forward, pause and rewind entire episodes. Short commercials will be 
aired with the programs; viewers will not be able to fast-forward through them.

Disney's ABC has been at the forefront of experimenting with new ways to 
distribute content over the Internet. Last year, it struck a deal with 
Apple Computer to sell individual episodes of some of its popular shows via 
the iTunes Music Store for $1.99 per episode. The two other major networks, 
NBC and CBS, soon followed suit by offering programs of their own on iTunes.

While the iTunes deal may have been a harbinger of bigger things to come in 
the realm of fee-based content downloads, Disney's move to offer shows for 
free on the Internet could be viewed as a direct threat to the business 
model of cable companies, which have been the gatekeepers of television 
programming in America for the last few decades. The news is equally grim 
for phone companies, especially Verizon Communications, which is 
aggressively moving into the TV business.

Over the past two years, Verizon has spent billions of dollars to build a 
fiber network directly into people's homes that can deliver a triple-play 
package of services including ultra-fast broadband, phone service and TV. 
It has bet the farm, so to speak, that the best way to compete against the 
cable companies, which are now offering phone service, is to try and beat 
them at their own game. But building and upgrading telecom networks for 
video is a capital-intensive strategy fraught with risks.

Disney's plans "raise big questions for the phone companies' long-term 
strategy," said Joe Laszlo, an analyst with JupiterResearch. "To some 
extent, building a faster network is smart no matter how content delivery 
evolves. But if we reach a point in five to 10 years when video over the 
Internet becomes a bigger part of how we consume video, then the phone 
companies will have to find other ways to make their video services relevant."

No one is expecting Internet television to cannibalize traditional TV 
models overnight. Despite advancements in streaming technology, video 
delivered on the Web can still be choppy, with frequent interruptions as 
data packets buffer and reload on the screen. In fact many viewers who 
watched the NCAA tournament aired by CBS on the Internet last month 
complained about the network being overloaded.


No panic among telecoms

A Verizon spokeswoman said the company does not feel threatened by Disney's 
move to offer some of its shows on the Web. And executives at the National 
Cable and Telecommunications Association convention in Atlanta this week 
also said they aren't especially worried about Disney's plans.

"It's speculative to assume people will abandon one model in favor of 
another," said Sharon Cohen-Hagar, a spokeswoman for Verizon. "That's quite 
a leap into the future. Given the kind of network we are building, we 
believe we're well positioned to go wherever the market takes this."

Indeed, Verizon, as well as the entrenched cable operators, are already 
offering on-demand programming that lets viewers select movies or TV shows 
and watch them whenever they want. They are also offering consumers digital 
recording services that let them record programs and watch them at a later 
time.
But advancements in technology could eventually eliminate the need for 
consumers to subscribe to a third party such as a cable operator or a 
telephone company to schedule programming. Companies such as Kontiki and 
EdgeStream are improving the quality of streaming video on the Net. And 
others such as Cisco Systems and Microsoft are working on products that 
will let people watch video downloads from the Net on their TVs.

These advancements, coupled with the fact that broadband penetration 
continues to grow, makes it possible for millions of people to watch TV 
directly from the Internet. In 2005, roughly 55 percent of all online users 
had broadband, according to JupiterResearch. That figure is expected to 
reach 69 percent by 2010.


A step toward a la carte

If content providers are willing to distribute their shows over the 
Internet themselves, viewers could simply use a search engine to find what 
they want to view, and then watch it directly from the Internet anytime 
they want.

Clearly Disney's move signals that content owners are feeling more 
comfortable about Internet distribution. Others have also started 
distributing video over the Net.

Warner Bros., for example, has teamed with AOL to distribute classic 
sitcoms such as "Growing Pains" and "Welcome Back Kotter." In March, CBS 
offered free online streaming of the NCAA basketball tournament. In 
November, NBC started offering its Nightly News broadcast on the Web for 
free after the newscast airs on TV. MTV's Comedy Central also launched a 
site called MotherLoad in November that offers clips of existing shows and 
airs new shows only available on the Web site.

And just last week, a group of Hollywood studios said they will sell 
digital versions of films such as "Brokeback Mountain" and "King Kong" 
through Movielink.com and CinemaNow with certain restrictions.

While experts agree that most people will continue to subscribe to a paid 
TV service for a long time coming, some research indicates there is 
consumer appetite to watch downloaded content from the Internet.

Parks Associates predicts that roughly 60 percent of broadband users will 
be downloading some video a la carte from the Web in 2010. These estimates 
were calculated when it was assumed that people would pay $1.99 an episode 
to download shows from iTunes, according to Kurt Scherf, vice president and 
principal analyst with Parks Associates. The figure could be even higher if 
content is offered for free, as Disney plans to do. Today, only about 3 
percent of broadband subscribers download video from the web.

Increased competition in the video market from Internet-based video 
services could cause network operators to look for other ways to make 
money, added JupiterResearch's Laszlo.

"Even though Disney is delivering content independently of the cable 
operator or the telephone company, it would be interesting to see if 
network providers respond by blocking content," he said.

The issue referred to as Net neutrality centers on whether carriers should 
be able to charge different fees to content providers who access their 
network. For weeks, the topic has been hotly debated in the industry as 
lawmakers draft legislation that addresses the issue.

"I think Disney's move could open up this debate even more," Laszlo said. 
"I wouldn't be surprised if we saw large media companies getting into the 
debate soon."


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to