Will DIRECTV & EchoStar Merge?
Speculation is rising at industry conferences and in newspaper accounts.

By Phillip Swann
TVPredictions.com

http://www.tvpredictions.com/satmerger071706.htm


Washington, D.C. (July 17, 2006) -- What's the hottest rumor in television 
today?

Satcasters DIRECTV and EchoStar will soon announce a merger.

A deal joining the nation's top satellite TV services has been speculated 
about for months. However, the rumors have suddenly escalated in the last 
few weeks with reports coming from last week's Allen & Co. media and 
technology conference in Idaho.

"Also floating through the mountain air was the perpetual rumor about a 
buyout of EchoStar, the satellite television company owned by Charles W. 
Ergen, who also attended the conference," The New York Times reported.

And a Reuters news article last week quoted Wall Street analysts as saying 
that the upcoming presidential election in 2008 could spur a wave of 
mergers (including DIRECTV-EchoStar) due to concerns that a Democratic 
administration would be less likely to approve them.

"I think if there's any prospect for (a DIRECTV-EchoStar)  deal at all ... 
it almost certainly has to be in a Republican administration," Craig 
Moffett, a media analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., told Reuters.

DIRECTV and EchoStar also helped fuel merger speculation this month when 
they teamed up to bid in next month's U.S. auction of wireless airwaves. 
And last March, Mike Palkovic, DIRECTV's chief financial officer, told an 
industry conference that his company was interested in buying EchoStar.

While Palkovic noted that the acquisition would face regulatory hurdles, he 
said: "We'd be nuts not to look at it." He even said the merger would be 
"desirable" even if it wasn't "feasible."

If the rumors prove to be true, the joining of the two companies would 
enable them to consolidate resources and offer more services to compete 
with the cable TV industry. Both DIRECTV and EchoStar are investing heavily 
in new satellites (and other infrastructure) to improve their 
High-Definition TV offerings.

Swanni Sez:
The Federal Communications Commission rejected EchoStar's attempt to buy 
DIRECTV in 2002, saying the deal would stifle competition in the satellite 
TV industry. (DIRECTV and EchoStar represent more than 95 percent of the 
satellite audience.)

However, the deal should not be entirely dismissed for three reasons.


1. Better Politics

The FCC's decision to reject the earlier EchoStar-DIRECTV deal was based in 
part on EchoStar's clumsy handling of the case. Led by Charlie Ergen, its 
irascible and always unpredictable CEO, EchoStar alienated key FCC members 
and staffers by repeatedly failing to submit key documents on time. The 
company also did a poor job of lobbying both FCC officials and 
congressional lawmakers.

Now led by the powerful and savvy News Corp. (and its omnipotent chairman, 
Rupert Murdoch), DIRECTV would not make the same mistake.


2. Better Lobbying

Four years ago, Murdoch's News Corp. launched a massive (and effective) 
lobbying campaign to block the EchoStar-DIRECTV deal.

Why?

Murdoch wanted to buy DIRECTV himself.

So, using his considerable influence in Washington, Murdoch helped 
orchestrate the deal's demise. (After the merger fell through, News Corp. 
purchased a controlling interest in the satellite TV service.)

If DIRECTV decided to buy EchoStar, Murdoch's D.C. connections -- and money 
-- could perhaps get the deal approved.


3. More Competition

With the launch of new TV services from telcos Verizon and AT&T, News Corp. 
could argue that competition within the satellite category is not as 
important as it was four years ago. In some cities, viewers can now choose 
from three TV providers -- cable, satellite and telephone.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to