July 17, 2006

BBC Presses for Financing, and Its Detractors Cry Foul
By ERIC PFANNER
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/17/business/media/17bbc.html?pagewanted=print


LONDON, July 16 — Jonathan Ross, a BBC talk show host with a vocabulary as 
colorful as his wardrobe, recently pushed things a shade further than 
usual. In language that would make an American television regulator blush, 
he asked David Cameron, leader of the Conservative Party, whether, as a 
teenager, he had fantasized sexually about Margaret Thatcher.

For critics of the BBC, the moment, which Mr. Cameron laughed off, provided 
a glorious opportunity to accuse the public broadcaster of losing its 
moorings. Mr. Ross, who is paid about $11 million, a year, became an 
example for claims that the BBC is arrogant, spendthrift and out of 
control, straying into areas of questionable taste as it tries to keep 
abreast of commercial broadcasters in a competitive media marketplace.

“Such puerile vulgarity is what passes for satire these days on the channel 
that once brought us ‘That Was the Week That Was’ on a shoestring budget,” 
The Scotsman, a newspaper, fumed in an editorial, referring to a 1960’s BBC 
show that poked fun at politicians of that era.

The BBC is under more than the usual degree of scrutiny because the license 
fee of $242 a year that every British television owner must pay to finance 
its operations is under review by the government. While the broadcaster’s 
royal charter has been renewed for another decade, the level of financing 
must still be determined.

A majority of Britons, in a recent survey commissioned by the BBC, said 
they supported the license fee. But the review process and the 
corporation’s plans for spending the money have opened the door to all 
sorts of critics from outside the BBC and some from within.

The BBC has asked the government to increase the license fee, which raises 
nearly $5.5 billion a year, by 2.3 percentage points more than the annual 
inflation rate over the next seven years. The BBC says the money is needed 
to pay for digital television and Internet services as it prepares for an 
uncertain future in which consumers will be able to choose from a 
proliferating array of media options.

Mark Thompson, director general of the BBC, is expected to announce on 
Wednesday a reorganization aimed at meeting this challenge.

“The BBC is going through huge change, moving from traditional linear 
broadcasting to the challenging and exciting world of interactive on-demand 
digital media,” Mr. Thompson said this month as the corporation published 
its annual report. “It means the BBC’s relationship with audiences is also 
constantly changing.”

Signs of change include declining audiences for the BBC’s flagship 
conventional television channels as viewers turn to digital alternatives or 
log on to the Internet.

Meanwhile, some of the BBC’s plans to move into new areas, particularly in 
its small but growing commercial activities, have upset some competitors in 
the private sector.

Some publishers, for instance, have complained about the BBC’s plans to 
start a weekly newsmagazine as part of its advertiser-supported print 
operations. And, while the BBC is prohibited from selling advertising on 
its television, radio and Internet services in Britain, overseas TV 
channels like BBC World have been raising money from commercials.

Now the BBC wants to add advertising to a new Web site for users outside 
Britain, who represent about a third of the traffic to the existing global 
Web site.

Although British Web users would continue to be routed to an ad-free site, 
some rivals say the proposal to sell online advertising would give the BBC 
an unfair advantage in the race to stake out new-media ground, given that 
the BBC’s online operations are, in effect, subsidized by license fees.

Some commercial broadcast rivals are already experiencing tough times as 
the BBC broadens its presence, a situation that might seem hard to imagine 
in markets like the United States, where public broadcasters have little 
hope of competing with the private sector.

Advertising revenue at the main television channel at ITV, the biggest 
British commercial broadcaster, has fallen sharply because of declining 
ratings and a shift to the Internet by many advertisers.

Charles Allen, the chief executive of ITV, recently told The Sunday Times 
of London that if the BBC received the full increase in the license fee, it 
“would distort the market to such an extent that it will be impossible for 
commercial broadcasters to compete on a level playing field.”

With the government set to determine the level of financing by the end of 
the year, a report that it commissioned from an outside auditor concluded 
that the BBC ought to impose some efficiencies. The BBC’s own cost-cutting 
plans have already created some internal tensions, however.

Several labor organizations representing BBC employees, including the 
National Union of Journalists, last week called on members to vote for a 
series of strikes next month to protest further job cuts.

More than 1,000 jobs have already been eliminated under a reorganization 
plan begun last year, and another 2,000 positions are scheduled to end.

The unions also object to proposed changes in the pension plan, as well as 
what they call meager raises while some executives are receiving big pay 
increases.

Although Mr. Thompson waived his bonus, and his paycheck last year of $1.12 
million was about a third of Mr. Allen’s at ITV, the unions say the 11 
percent raise he received was one more example of how the BBC is 
increasingly acting like a commercial bully, rather than the genteel public 
broadcaster it once was.


================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
antunes at uh dot edu



Reply with a "Thank you" if you liked this post.
_____________________________

MEDIANEWS mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to