On 25.05.2008, 10:52 VasilievVV wrote: > Max Semenik managed to write: >> API is intended for bots, not humans. Making it accept anon edits just >> allows bots to edit accidentally logged off. And the AssertEdit >> extension doesn't seem to work for API. What can be done about this? >> >> Simply adding an AlternateEdit hook call to ApiEditPage leads to ugly >> HTML output. >> >> > I thought about assertions in API. I'll add them this week. > --VasilievVV
This hook was implemented by Bryan Tong Minh in 35294[1], and in conjunction wit AssertEdit it leads, as I warned, to AssertEdit attempting to display a HTML error page and choking with "Fatal error: Call to a member function getPrefixedText() on a non-object in C:\Projects\MediaWiki\includes\OutputPage.php on line 1314" instead of proper XML output. I suppose that other extensions that don't expect to be called from API may exhibit the same behaviour. ---- [1] http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki?view=rev&revision=35294 -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) _______________________________________________ Mediawiki-api mailing list Mediawiki-api@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-api
