On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Max Semenik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25.05.2008, 10:52 VasilievVV wrote: > >> Max Semenik managed to write: >>> API is intended for bots, not humans. Making it accept anon edits just >>> allows bots to edit accidentally logged off. And the AssertEdit >>> extension doesn't seem to work for API. What can be done about this? >>> >>> Simply adding an AlternateEdit hook call to ApiEditPage leads to ugly >>> HTML output. >>> >>> >> I thought about assertions in API. I'll add them this week. >> --VasilievVV > > This hook was implemented by Bryan Tong Minh in 35294[1], and in > conjunction wit AssertEdit it leads, as I warned, to AssertEdit > attempting to display a HTML error page and choking with > "Fatal error: Call to a member function getPrefixedText() on a > non-object in C:\Projects\MediaWiki\includes\OutputPage.php on line > 1314" instead of proper XML output. I suppose that other extensions > that don't expect to be called from API may exhibit the same > behaviour. > > ---- > [1] http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki?view=rev&revision=35294 > > -- > Best regards, > Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) > > > _______________________________________________ > Mediawiki-api mailing list > Mediawiki-api@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-api > I think I added that hook on the wrong place. It should probably somewhere after the title has been set.
Bryan _______________________________________________ Mediawiki-api mailing list Mediawiki-api@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-api
