Our most interest is protecting query results via ACLs on Categories - so pages 
of specific categories would not be exposable to specific user groups 

As for how haloacl deals with properties -as I remember it was dealing a bit 
weird - it protected the values of specific properties(in query results for 
those particular properties? Not sure) while the page itself was still 
exposable.

Our intention is to be able to hide pages with specific property values from 
query results (including hiding from sub-queries results, output of query to 
template, etc)

--
Evgeniy Dankovcev

On Aug 25, 2013, at 11:40, [email protected] wrote:

>> Hi Vitaliy,
>> 
>> Do you have any plans to add support of Semantic Mediawiki into IntraACL?
>> We tried to use HaloACL on our wikis, but there are too many bugs and
>> problems on large amount of articles
> 
> Hi, what support do you really want? I.e. do you want to protect properties 
> like in HaloACL? (I've almost forgotten how it was done there... can you 
> refresh it to me?)
> 
> Or normal page (subject) protection will be enough? The latter is in my 
> plans, though for SMW it's slightly harder than for small extensions, and 
> also by SMW people generally mean more semantic extensions... and they also 
> need that support.
> 
> You can even do this patching job by yourself - it's simple, you just need to 
> find places where the content is taken from / saved to the DB and add 
> $title->userCanRead() checks there.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mediawiki-enterprise mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-enterprise

_______________________________________________
Mediawiki-enterprise mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-enterprise

Reply via email to