2009/4/28 McHale, Nina <[email protected]>:
> Hey, all,
>
> Some of my colleagues are objecting to my desire to minimize uploading of 
> Word documents to our new intranet wiki. My main objection to it is that we 
> ought to be entering information into wiki pages so that we can take full 
> advantage of document versioning, talk pages, watching, etc.-y'know, the 
> stuff that makes it a wiki...
>
> I've been called "silly" and "arbitrary" regarding this. :) I'm not outright 
> forbidding posting Word documents; I'm just trying to get people to use the 
> wiki the way it's mean to be used. Am I being unreasonable? I even stated 
> that it's acceptable to load the final version of a 20-page report, or a form 
> that's meant to be printed out and filled out by hand-i.e., things in a final 
> state that do not need further editing.
>
> Has anyone else encountered this resistance? I was most surprised that it 
> came from someone who uses/edits Wikipedia, which, >as far as I can tell, 
> does not support uploading of Word docs.

Don't make your practices fit the tool, choose your tool to fit what
you need. If people want a central repository for Word documents,
MediaWiki isn't the thing to use. There are plenty of CVSs, etc. that
can handle document versioning, watching, etc.

You need to come to a consensus on what you want out of your IT
systems and then choose a tool which achieves that.

_______________________________________________
MediaWiki-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l

Reply via email to