This actually came from the Key Equipment Finance wiki. We've found it to be pretty good, but not perfect, in a corporate environment. This addressed point #2, and we've used FCKEditor with pretty good success for #1. Many folks would argue there's a #3 (fine-grained security), but I've managed to hold them off on that front thus far.
David Garard wrote: > I'm still looking forward to corporate readiness of MediaWiki, which > for us basically means (1) good WYSIWYG (2) good search. (2) means > Lucene in a box. We hardly care what box. > > (The competitor is Confluence. Which is highly usable and an UTTER > BASTARD to administer. Though Atlassian are very good at support.) > > > - d. > _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
