On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Jack D. Pond<[email protected]> wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AUM > > I was unaware this topic had been addressed. Whether or not I agree with > the discussion, I certainly do not want to reopen old wounds. Obviously the > correct approach would be to write an extension. > > Thanks for pointing me to the discussion Trevor. > > Jack You should note that AUM didn't come to consensus so isn't counted as really valid.
_______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
