am 10.08.2009 14:46 schrieb Sumurai8 (DD): > Peter Velan wrote: >> In modern/main.css the related styles defined like ... >> >> #mw_content a[...] >> >> ... in all *other* supplied skins (including monobook) the definitions >> look line ... >> >> #bodyContent a[...] >> >> I duplicated every "#mw_content a[...]"-definition (needed for modern) >> in Common.css as "#bodyContent a[...]" (needed for all other skins) >> and finally it works :-) >> >> Could somebody explain, why there's different style definitions >> (#mw_content vs #bodyContent)? > > First there was nothing... > > ...and then MediaWiki showed up. ;-) I can't find the link where I read > first about all the skins, but possibly it is somewhere on MediaWiki.org > actually; Monobook was created far before modern was. 'myskin', 'monobook' > and some more skins looks pretty the same, but modern was created in 1.12 < > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgDefaultSkin> and uses other id's; > therefore, modern uses it's own common, print and such .css'es. > > See also en-wikipedia's: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Gadgets and > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-modernskin-thunks.js
Thank you. Will take a deeper look to above stuff. Peter _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
