> But they say that mediawiki user right management > is not enough powerful for us.
And the are right to say that. "MediaWiki is not designed to be a CMS, or to protect sensitive data. To the contrary, it was designed to be as open as possible. Thus it does not inherently support full featured, air-tight protection of private content. But with the massive increase of MediaWiki use in corporate intranets and the many CMS-like features emerging, demand for tighter security is emerging." (Quote from "Security issues with authorization extensions") http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Security_issues_with_authorization_extensions What happens if security is not tight enough? Is security important in your intranet? Regards Claus _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
