nevio carlos de alarcão wrote: >> Of course, if you (or Bernard) see some relevance in the >> question that I have failed to see, please let me know... >> >> > > Dear, I see your point. However I think we are a community either and, and > from this point of view, I think we should address this subject. > Respectfully > > 2010/5/28 Raymond Wan <[email protected]> > > Thanks all for responding. It is indeed about the community. And I do agree Wikipedia, Wikimedia and MediaWiki are different although close related. The subject is not about Wikipedia. On Wikipedia there is a well structured procedures, even some automated implemented, about moral standards and how to act if they are abused. If we didn't have them for Wikipedia, the content of Wikipedia could not have been close to the quality we have now.
It is about the community with different actors in it. If we are able to define moral standards and how to act if abused I think the quality of the community and the pleasure working in it will increase. With regards, Bernard _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
